Dot Product: Understanding and Solving with Vectors | Homework Help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the dot product of two vectors, b and c, represented as b = x hat + y hat and c = x hat + z hat. The user initially calculates the dot product using the component method, yielding a result of 1, but encounters confusion when applying the cosine formula, which suggests an angle of 90 degrees and a result of 0. Clarification reveals that both methods are valid; however, the angle between the vectors is actually 60 degrees, not 90 degrees. This discrepancy explains why the two approaches yield different results. Understanding the correct angle is crucial for accurately applying the dot product formulas.
Rijad Hadzic
Messages
321
Reaction score
20

Homework Statement


Im given vectors:

b = x hat + y hat
c = x hat + z hat

Homework Equations


http://imgur.com/a/iHTOT

The Attempt at a Solution


so I have 2 eq's... one says:
r * s = rscos(theta)

the other is a summation saying multiply x component 1 with x component 2, add y component 1 with y component 2, and so on.

Ok so I start with method 2: 1*1 x hat + 1* 0 y hat + 0*1 z hat

so you end with 1 (my books answer).

But when I use "r * s = rscos(theta)" I find the angle between them is 90 degrees so I get 0.

Whv does 1 formula work in this case but the other doesnt
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rijad Hadzic said:

Homework Statement


Im given vectors:

b = x hat + y hat
c = x hat + z hat

Homework Equations


http://imgur.com/a/iHTOT

The Attempt at a Solution


so I have 2 eq's... one says:
r * s = rscos(theta)

the other is a summation saying multiply x component 1 with x component 2, add y component 1 with y component 2, and so on.

Ok so I start with method 2: 1*1 x hat + 1* 0 y hat + 0*1 z hat
No, this isn't what it is saying. What you get from a dot product is a number -- no vectors involved.

There are two forms for the dot product of vectors in ##\mathbb{R}^3##: one that involves the cosine of the angle between the vectors, and the other that involves the sum of the products of the components.

Assuming these are your vectors. ##\vec r = <1, 1, 0>## and ##\vec s = <1, 0, 1>##, then ##\vec r \cdot \vec s = 1 \cdot 1 + 1 \cdot 0 + 0 \cdot 1 = 1##

Rijad Hadzic said:
so you end with 1 (my books answer).

But when I use "r * s = rscos(theta)" I find the angle between them is 90 degrees so I get 0.

Whv does 1 formula work in this case but the other doesnt
Both formulas work, but the angle between the two vectors is not 90° - they are actually 60° apart.
 
  • Like
Likes Sunbodi
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top