Driven RLC circiut in parallel

  • Thread starter Thread starter silverdiesel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel Rlc
silverdiesel
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
I need some help setting up the DE for this system. I have a voltage source pumping at V_0cos(wt)

Connected to a capacitor, inductor and resistor all three in parrellel. I am guessing then, that the voltage drop among all the parts are equal.

<br /> V_0 cos(wt) = \frac{Q}{C} = L \ddot{Q} = \dot{Q} R<br />

Then, The total charge on all parts would be equal to the sum of charges, right?

<br /> Q_{Total} = \\Q_C + Q_L +Q_R<br />

But what is the Q total? I have these two equations, but I am having a hard time understanding how to combine them into one single DE that I can solve.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
silverdiesel said:
I need some help setting up the DE for this system. I have a voltage source pumping at V_0cos(wt)

Connected to a capacitor, inductor and resistor all three in parrellel. I am guessing then, that the voltage drop among all the parts are equal.

<br /> V_0 cos(wt) = \frac{Q}{C} = L \ddot{Q} = \dot{Q} R<br />

Then, The total charge on all parts would be equal to the sum of charges, right?

<br /> Q_{Total} = \\Q_C + Q_L +Q_R<br />

But what is the Q total? I have these two equations, but I am having a hard time understanding how to combine them into one single DE that I can solve.
If you just give it a one time zap and remove the voltage, you will have:

L\frac{dI}{dt} + \frac{Q}{C} = IR or

L\frac{dI}{dt} + \frac{Q}{C} - IR = 0

This is because the current through the resistor has to come from the emf produced by the capacitor and the inductor.

Now take the same circuit and apply a forcing voltage.

L\frac{dI_L}{dt} + \frac{Q_c}{C} + V_0\cos\omega t = IR or

IR - (L\frac{dI_L}{dt} + \frac{Q_c}{C}) = V_0\cos\omega t

Of course: I_L = \dot{Q} \text{ and } \frac{dI_L}{dt} = \ddot{Q_L}

and I_L + I_C = I

AM
 
Last edited:
okay, I appreciate the help. It seems that this is the same as setting up the circuit in series. (V1+V2+V3=V, Q1=Q2=Q3=Q) Is there no difference when setting up the circuit in parallel? I was thinking V1=V2=V3=V, and Q1+Q2+Q3=Q.
 
silverdiesel said:
okay, I appreciate the help. It seems that this is the same as setting up the circuit in series. (V1+V2+V3=V, Q1=Q2=Q3=Q) Is there no difference when setting up the circuit in parallel? I was thinking V1=V2=V3=V, and Q1+Q2+Q3=Q.
The difference is that the currents are not the same. I_L, I_C \text{ and } I_R will be different. They are necessarily the same when in series.

AM
 
Since all elements are in parallel they have the same voltage drop.
You have three currents:
i_R(t) = \frac{V_s(t)}{R}
i_C(t) = C\frac{dV_s(t)}{dt}
i_L(t) = i_L(0) + \frac{1}{L}\int_{0}^{t}V_s(\tau)d\tau
Where V_s(t) = V_0 cos(\omega t)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top