E-potential in cell membrane HELPP PLEAASEE

  • Thread starter Thread starter geyikrali
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cell Membrane
geyikrali
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Cell membranes (the walled enclosure around a cell) are typically about 7.5 nm thick. They are partially permeable to allow charged material to pass in and out, as needed. Equal but opposite charge densities build up on the inside and outside faces of such a membrane, and these charges prevent additional charges from passing through the cell wall. We can model a cell membrane as a parallel-plate capacitor, with the membrane itself containing proteins embedded in an organic material to give the membrane a dielectric constant of about 10.

In its normal resting state, a cell has a potential difference of 85 mV across its membrane. What is the electric field inside this membrane?


Homework Equations



V=Ed, E(0)=E/K, c=Q/V

The Attempt at a Solution



I put values V=Ed and get E=[85*10^(-3)]/ [7.5*10^(-9)] = 11.33*10^6
But system says that this answer is not correct.. What should I have to do?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Masteringphysics is wrong.
 
asterrol said:
Masteringphysics is wrong.
Care to expand?
 
normal resting state means nonpolarized state...
 
asterrol said:
normal resting state means nonpolarized state...
Erm... no it doesn't. Even when a neurone is at it's resting potential, the cell membrane is still polarised.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top