Earth's Magnetic Dipole Moment

AI Thread Summary
The Earth's magnetic dipole moment is measured at 8.0 x 10^22 A m², with the magnetic field strength at the north magnetic pole calculated to be 6.17e-5 T, which is 1.23 times the typical surface field strength of 5.0 x 10^-5 T. A discussion arose regarding how to generate a magnetic field on an earth-sized planet lacking one, specifically by running a current around its equator to match Earth's magnetic dipole moment. Participants clarified the distinction between magnetic dipole moment and magnetic dipole, ultimately confirming they are the same. The conversation emphasized the importance of understanding the definitions and equations related to magnetic fields and dipoles.
majormaaz
Messages
61
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The Earth's magnetic dipole moment is 8.0 x 1022 A m2.

(a) What is the magnetic field strength on the surface of the Earth at the Earth's north magnetic pole? You can assume that the current loop is deep inside the earth. 6.17e-5 T

(b)How does this compare to 5.0 x 10-5 T, the typical field strength on the surface of the earth?
1.23 times the typical field strength

(c)Astronauts discover an earth-size planet without a magnetic field. To create a magnetic field, so that compasses will work, they propose running a current through a wire around the equator. What size current would be needed? (Give the current necessary to produce a magnetic dipole equal to the earth's.)

Homework Equations


Bloop = (μ0/4∏)*(2AI/z3) --> on-axis magnetic field of a current loop/.
AI = magnetic dipole moment μ

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm confused as what to do, as it says to find a current necessary to produce a magnetic dipole, whereas the only term I'm familiar with in the context of this problem is the magnetic dipole moment AI. If someone could help me clarify which term I should be focusing on so that I can use the appropriate equation, that'd be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you might be overcomplicating part c). I would look at how the magnetic dipole is defined/derived and substitute the values in directly.
 
paisiello2 said:
I think you might be overcomplicating part c). I would look at how the magnetic dipole is defined/derived and substitute the values in directly.

Yeah, I got the right answer. Basically, I was confused whether the magnetic dipole moment was the same thing as the magnetic dipole or not, but it turns out it is. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top