Eccentricity of a compressed circular ring

AI Thread Summary
Eccentricity is specifically defined for circles and ellipses, making it inapplicable to the scenario described. When a circular ring is altered by cutting a section and compressing it, the resulting shape does not fit the criteria for eccentricity. The discussion indicates that there is no established equation to quantify the eccentricity of such a modified ring. Therefore, the concept of eccentricity cannot be applied to the situation presented. The inquiry highlights the limitations of geometric definitions in non-standard shapes.
g0ggs123
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
If an initially circular ring is made out of round by cutting out a section of the ring (delta g) and compressing the ring till the gap is approx zero is there an equation to describe the eccentricity of the circle?

Cheers

Gordon
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
g0ggs123 said:
If an initially circular ring is made out of round by cutting out a section of the ring (delta g) and compressing the ring till the gap is approx zero is there an equation to describe the eccentricity of the circle?

Cheers

Gordon

In a word, no. Eccentricity is defined for circles and ellipses. What you describe is probably neither.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
2
Replies
96
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top