Effect of specific heat of a substance on the rate of heat flow

AI Thread Summary
Specific heat capacity does not directly affect the rate of heat flow between substances; instead, the heat transfer coefficient is the primary factor influencing this rate. When two substances at different temperatures interact, the net heat flow occurs from the hotter to the colder substance, and this flow rate depends on the temperature difference, geometry, and heat transfer coefficients rather than specific heat capacity. While specific heat capacity influences how quickly a substance's temperature changes over time, it does not impact the instantaneous rate of heat transfer. Therefore, while a substance with a higher specific heat capacity may resist temperature changes more effectively, the immediate rate of heat flow is determined by other factors.
emporia
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have been wondering, does specific heat capacity affect the rate of heat flow from one substance to another?

For example if the substances at heated up to the same temperature then left outside until thermal equilibrium is reached. I would think the one with the larger specific heat capacity (substance x) cools at a faster rate as the energy difference between it and the atmosphere is greater than the one with a smal specific heat (substance y).

The larger the energy difference the greater the rate of heat flow. As this energy difference becomes smaller due to the substance the rate of flow would lessen.

The rate of heat flow behaves similarly to an exponential funtion, therefore am i correct in assuming that the affect of specific heat on heat flow is offset by the decrease of the energy difference effectively cancelling out the effect of specific heat?
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Energy difference isn't what is important. Temperature difference is. Surface area is. All things being equal, the material with the greatest heat capacity will resist a change in temperature more so than one with a small heat capacity.

That is kind of the definition of heat capacity, y'know.
 
emporia said:
I have been wondering, does heat capacity affect the rate of heat flow from one substance to another?

No. Heat transfer coefficient is the only thing that counts.
 
Borek said:
No. Heat transfer coefficient is the only thing that counts.

Thanks for that.
I'm just puzzled now that my chemistry teacher agreed with me on the previous explanation but was doubtful when i suggested that heat capacity doen't affect heat flow.
 
Well... there is a heat flow and there is a heat flow :wink:

Say you have two bodies of different temperatures. Net heat flow is that from the hotter body to the colder body. Amount of the the heat that flows in the time unit is just a power - and this power doesn't depend on the heat capacity, in any given moment it depends on the temperature difference, geometry of the system and heat capacity coefficient. Period.

Now, if you are interested not in in a situation at any given time point, but in the changes of the temperature in a long period of time, knowing just power transmitted in any moment is not enough. You have to account for heat capacity of the system, as it will change the speed at which temperature of the different parts of the system will change - changing heat flow (power).
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top