Effect of TIME on SPECIFIC HEAT?

AI Thread Summary
The experiment involved using a calorimeter to determine the specific heat of an unknown metal by measuring the initial and final temperatures after adding the metal to water. The time taken to reach equilibrium is significant as it can provide insights into the heat transfer efficiency and thermal properties of the materials involved. To visualize the data, plotting temperature variation against time is recommended, which can illustrate how quickly the system reaches thermal equilibrium. This graph can help in analyzing the cooling or heating rates of the substances. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for deeper insights into thermal interactions in calorimetry.
donkeycopter
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
We did an experiment using a calorimeter in class, where we dropped a hot piece of metal into water in the calorimeter. We measured initial temp of metal + water, and the final equilibrium temperature. This allowed us to calculated the specific heat of the unknown metal (we also had the mass etc).


However, we also were asked to measure the TIME taken to reach equilibrium after the metal was added to the water, but why? What significance does the time to reach equilibrium have?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What graphs should I draw?

We did an experiment using a calorimeter in class, where we dropped a hot piece of metal into water in the calorimeter. We measured initial temp of metal + water, and the final equilibrium temperature. This allowed us to calculated the specific heat of the unknown metal (we also had the mass etc). We also measured the time taken to reach equilibrium temperature.

What graphs should I plot though? We were told to plot graphs but I've got no idea what to plot.

Thanks!
 


you may plot temperature variation with time!
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Calorimetry Lab Analysis (predict specific heat of unknown metal)
2
Replies
54
Views
8K
What is the specific heat of the metal in this specific heat problem?
Replies
3
Views
1K
I try to solve a thermodynamics problem on heat transfer
Replies
3
Views
2K
Determining the specific heat capacity of water
Replies
7
Views
2K
Problem involving specific heat and graph
Replies
3
Views
1K
Finding Specific Heat of Unknown Metal
Replies
3
Views
4K
Specific heat in for the Otto cycle
Replies
1
Views
2K
Specific heat capacity of calorimeter
Replies
6
Views
3K
Why does this question make this simplifying assumption?
Replies
8
Views
941
Specific heat capacity coursework
Replies
3
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top