Efficiency, Stirling heat engine

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the efficiency of a Stirling heat engine, with various equations provided for heat transfers (Q) and the relationship between specific heats (κ). The user presents their derived efficiency formula, which involves logarithmic terms and temperature variables, seeking confirmation of its correctness. Another participant suggests starting from the basic efficiency equation, emphasizing the relationship between work done and heat input. The conversation highlights the importance of clearly defining input and output heat to accurately derive the efficiency formula.
dave84
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



AhKqy.png


We have a Stirling heat engine. I'm calculating the efficiency \eta.

Homework Equations



Q_{12} = \frac{m R T_2}{M} \ln(\frac{V_2}{V_1}) > 0

Q_{23} = m c_v (T_1 - T_2) < 0

Q_{34} = \frac{m R T_1}{M} \ln(\frac{V_1}{V_2}) < 0

Q_{41} = m c_v (T_2 - T_1) > 0

\kappa = \frac{c_p}{c_v}

\frac{R}{c_v M} = \kappa - 1

The Attempt at a Solution



My result is \eta = \frac{|(\kappa-1)T_1 \ln(\frac{V_1}{V_2})+(\kappa-1)T_2 \ln(\frac{V_2}{V_1})|}{(T_2 - T_1) + (\kappa - 1)T_2 \ln(\frac{V_2}{V_1})}.

Can anyone confirm this? I'm sorry if this is too trivial.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dave84 said:

Homework Statement



AhKqy.png


We have a Stirling heat engine. I'm calculating the efficiency \eta.

Homework Equations



Q_{12} = \frac{m R T_2}{M} \ln(\frac{V_2}{V_1}) > 0

Q_{23} = m c_v (T_1 - T_2) < 0

Q_{34} = \frac{m R T_1}{M} \ln(\frac{V_1}{V_2}) < 0

Q_{41} = m c_v (T_2 - T_1) > 0

\kappa = \frac{c_p}{c_v}

\frac{R}{c_v M} = \kappa - 1

The Attempt at a Solution



My result is \eta = \frac{(\kappa-1)T_1 \ln(\frac{V_1}{V_2})+(\kappa-1)T_2 \ln(\frac{V_2}{V_1})}{(T_2 - T_1) + (\kappa - 1)T_2 \ln(\frac{V_2}{V_1})}.

Can anyone confirm this? I'm sorry if this is too trivial.
You will have show your reasoning to explain how you arrived at this. You could start by showing us your expression for η in terms of Q41, Q12, Q23, and Q34.

AM
 
So \eta = \frac{|A|}{Q_{in}} =\frac{|Q_{12}+Q_{34}|}{Q_{41} + Q_{12}}, where A is total work done and Q is the input heat. The final result is simplified with \kappa.

Q_{in} = Q_{41} + Q_{12}
Q_{out} = Q_{23} + Q_{34} = Q_{in} - A

Q_{out} is the amount of heat that is released from the heat engine.
 
Last edited:
dave84 said:
So \eta = \frac{|A|}{Q_{in}} =\frac{Q_{12}+Q_{34}}{Q_{41} + Q_{12}}, where A is total work done and Q is the input heat. The final result is simplified with \kappa.

Q_{in} = Q_{41} + Q_{12}
Q_{out} = Q_{23} + Q_{34} = Q_{in} - A

Q_{out} is the amount of heat that is released from the heat engine.
I am not sure how you got your equation for efficiency. Start with \eta = \frac{|W|}{Q_{in}}.
You can rewrite this as:

\eta = W/Q_{in} = (Q_{in}-Q_{out})/Q_{in} = 1 - Q_{out}/Q_{in} = 1 - (Q_{23} + Q_{34})/(Q_{41} + Q_{12})

Can you show us what this reduces to?

AM
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top