Efficiency, Stirling heat engine

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the efficiency of a Stirling heat engine, with various equations provided for heat transfers (Q) and the relationship between specific heats (κ). The user presents their derived efficiency formula, which involves logarithmic terms and temperature variables, seeking confirmation of its correctness. Another participant suggests starting from the basic efficiency equation, emphasizing the relationship between work done and heat input. The conversation highlights the importance of clearly defining input and output heat to accurately derive the efficiency formula.
dave84
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



AhKqy.png


We have a Stirling heat engine. I'm calculating the efficiency \eta.

Homework Equations



Q_{12} = \frac{m R T_2}{M} \ln(\frac{V_2}{V_1}) > 0

Q_{23} = m c_v (T_1 - T_2) < 0

Q_{34} = \frac{m R T_1}{M} \ln(\frac{V_1}{V_2}) < 0

Q_{41} = m c_v (T_2 - T_1) > 0

\kappa = \frac{c_p}{c_v}

\frac{R}{c_v M} = \kappa - 1

The Attempt at a Solution



My result is \eta = \frac{|(\kappa-1)T_1 \ln(\frac{V_1}{V_2})+(\kappa-1)T_2 \ln(\frac{V_2}{V_1})|}{(T_2 - T_1) + (\kappa - 1)T_2 \ln(\frac{V_2}{V_1})}.

Can anyone confirm this? I'm sorry if this is too trivial.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dave84 said:

Homework Statement



AhKqy.png


We have a Stirling heat engine. I'm calculating the efficiency \eta.

Homework Equations



Q_{12} = \frac{m R T_2}{M} \ln(\frac{V_2}{V_1}) > 0

Q_{23} = m c_v (T_1 - T_2) < 0

Q_{34} = \frac{m R T_1}{M} \ln(\frac{V_1}{V_2}) < 0

Q_{41} = m c_v (T_2 - T_1) > 0

\kappa = \frac{c_p}{c_v}

\frac{R}{c_v M} = \kappa - 1

The Attempt at a Solution



My result is \eta = \frac{(\kappa-1)T_1 \ln(\frac{V_1}{V_2})+(\kappa-1)T_2 \ln(\frac{V_2}{V_1})}{(T_2 - T_1) + (\kappa - 1)T_2 \ln(\frac{V_2}{V_1})}.

Can anyone confirm this? I'm sorry if this is too trivial.
You will have show your reasoning to explain how you arrived at this. You could start by showing us your expression for η in terms of Q41, Q12, Q23, and Q34.

AM
 
So \eta = \frac{|A|}{Q_{in}} =\frac{|Q_{12}+Q_{34}|}{Q_{41} + Q_{12}}, where A is total work done and Q is the input heat. The final result is simplified with \kappa.

Q_{in} = Q_{41} + Q_{12}
Q_{out} = Q_{23} + Q_{34} = Q_{in} - A

Q_{out} is the amount of heat that is released from the heat engine.
 
Last edited:
dave84 said:
So \eta = \frac{|A|}{Q_{in}} =\frac{Q_{12}+Q_{34}}{Q_{41} + Q_{12}}, where A is total work done and Q is the input heat. The final result is simplified with \kappa.

Q_{in} = Q_{41} + Q_{12}
Q_{out} = Q_{23} + Q_{34} = Q_{in} - A

Q_{out} is the amount of heat that is released from the heat engine.
I am not sure how you got your equation for efficiency. Start with \eta = \frac{|W|}{Q_{in}}.
You can rewrite this as:

\eta = W/Q_{in} = (Q_{in}-Q_{out})/Q_{in} = 1 - Q_{out}/Q_{in} = 1 - (Q_{23} + Q_{34})/(Q_{41} + Q_{12})

Can you show us what this reduces to?

AM
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top