Efficient Integration of A, a, and \lambda in Sticky Integral: A Helpful Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter eep
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
eep
Messages
225
Reaction score
0
I am now asked to integrate the following:

\int^\infty_{-\infty}xAe^{-\lambda(x-a)^2}dx = A\int^\infty_{-\infty}xe^{-\lambda(x-a)^2}dx

Where A, a, and \lambda are positive, real constants.

I first tried to do it by parts but that left me with infinities.

Then I tried setting u = x - a and did some re-arranging, which left me with:

A\int^\infty_{-\infty}(u+a)e^{{-\lambda}u^2}dx = Aa\sqrt\frac{\pi}{\lambda}

Is this correct? Also, why does integrated by parts fail?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yea, that look's right. Integration by parts always works, it's just that sometimes it will give you the sum of two function which individually diverge on the interval you're interested in (maybe one to positive infinity and one to negative infinity), but are such that the limit of their sum is finite.
 
Ah, I see. I followed the method you posted last time to solve only the exponential part of the integral, but what method can be used to solve this? I had to look up the answer in a table, which I don't mind doing, but I feel it's important to do the integral by hand at least once.
 
The lefthand side of your last equation is a sum of two functions, one which is odd and integrated over an even range, so it integrates to zero, and one which you did in the other post.
 
In "Principles of Mathematical Analysis" by Rudin, ch. 6, exercise #9 indicates that: There are hypotheses required in order that integration by parts may be applied to improper integrals (the ones with infinite bounds of integration,) but it doesn't specify what thoses hypotheses are (that's the exercise.)
 
eep said:
I had to look up the answer in a table, which I don't mind doing, but I feel it's important to do the integral by hand at least once.

This is wonderful. Thank you. :smile:
 
By the way, in case you're interested (and since this seems to be the direction you're heading), indefinite integrals of the form:

\int x^n e^{-ax^2} dx

do not have simple closed forms for n even. But there is a trick if your bounds are infinite. Starting with:

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-ax^2} dx=\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{a}}

You can repeatedly differentiate both sides with respect to a to get:

\frac{\partial}{\partial a} \left( \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-ax^2} dx \right) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} (-x^2) e^{-ax^2} dx =\frac{-1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{a^3}}

and so on. You can also integrate from zero to infinity by noting that these functions are even. For n odd, you can get an explicit formula for the antiderivative. For simplicity, assume a=1 (you can figure out what to do otherwise). Then use the substitution u=x^2 (assume n=2k+1):

\int x^n e^{-x^2} dx=\frac{1}{2}\int x^{2k} e^{-x^2} ( 2xdx)=\frac{1}{2}\int u^k e^{-u} du

Which can be integrated by parts (or by looking up the gamma function if your bounds are again infinite).
 
Last edited:
Thank you so much!
 

Similar threads

Replies
47
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
105
Views
4K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top