Eigenfunction energy levels in a harmonic well

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the energy eigenfunctions in a harmonic oscillator, specifically examining the first two eigenfunctions and the incorrect assumption about the third eigenfunction's form. It is clarified that the proposed third eigenfunction is not orthogonal to the first and second, making it invalid. The conversation shifts to how to express the time-dependent wave function for a system initially described by a superposition of the first and third eigenfunctions. The user is guided to use the energy levels associated with the eigenfunctions to derive the time evolution of the wave function. Overall, the user is confirmed to be on the right track in their approach.
Lazy Rat
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the first two energy eigenfunctions are
## \psi _0(x) = (\frac {1}{\sqrt \pi a})^ \frac{1}{2} e^\frac{-x^2}{2a^2} ##,
## \psi _1(x) = (\frac {1}{2\sqrt \pi a})^ \frac{1}{2}\frac{2x}{a} e^\frac{-x^2}{2a^2} ##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Would it then be correct to presume
## \psi _3(x) = (\frac {1}{4\sqrt \pi a})^ \frac{1}{2}\frac{4x}{a} e^\frac{-x^2}{2a^2} ##

Thank you for your time in considering this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lazy Rat said:
Would it then be correct to presume ...
It would not because it is not orthogonal to ##\psi_1(x)## but the same as ##\psi_1(x)##. Also, you do not state the question that the problem asks.
 
No. In terms of ladder operators, the nth eigenfunction is given by

<br /> <br /> |n \rangle \equiv \psi_{n}(x) = \frac{(a^\dagger)^n}{\sqrt{n!}} |0 \rangle<br /> <br />
 
the specific question goes as so

For this equation

## \Psi (x,0) = \frac {1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi_1 (x)-\psi_3 (x)) ##

The system is undisturbed, obtain an expression for ##\psi (x,t)## that is valid for all t ≥ 0. Express in terms of the functions ##\psi_1 (x)##, ##\psi_3 (x)## and ##ω_0##, the classical angular frequency of the oscillator.

I am trying to approach this by simply inputting the eigenfunctions for

##\psi _1(x) = (\frac {1}{2\sqrt \pi a})^ \frac{1}{2}\frac{2x}{a} e^\frac{-x^2}{2a^2}##

And then for

##\psi _3(x)## (which as yet I haven't understood)

And

##a = \sqrt{\frac {\hbar}{ω_0}}##

Would this be the correct approach to express in the terms as stated?

Thank you for assisting me with my problem.
 
So would i use the fact that ## E_1 = \frac {3}{2} \hbar ω_0 ## which would give ## e^ \frac {- 3iω_0t}{2} ##
And ## E_3 = \frac {7}{2} \hbar ω_0 ## which would give ## e^ \frac {- 7iω_0t}{2} ##

Am I on the right track?
 
Lazy Rat said:
So would i use the fact that ## E_1 = \frac {3}{2} \hbar ω_0 ## which would give ## e^ \frac {- 3iω_0t}{2} ##
And ## E_3 = \frac {7}{2} \hbar ω_0 ## which would give ## e^ \frac {- 7iω_0t}{2} ##

Am I on the right track?

Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes Lazy Rat
Back
Top