Elastic and inelastic collisions

AI Thread Summary
In elastic collisions, both momentum and kinetic energy are conserved, which is evident when a low-energy particle collides with a stationary particle, resulting in a 90-degree angle between their paths. However, in high-energy proton collisions, the angle deviates due to relativistic effects, as the moving proton's mass increases near the speed of light. The distinction between elastic and inelastic collisions lies in whether the colliding particles remain unchanged; for instance, proton-proton collisions are elastic, while collisions involving electrons can produce different particles, indicating inelasticity. The equation ½ mu² = ½ mv² + ½ ms² applies to elastic collisions, but the ms term can be confusing as it relates to the kinetic energy of the system. Understanding these principles clarifies the nature of particle interactions in physics.
mystreet123
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A low-energy particle collides elastically with a stationary particle of the same mass. The angle between the subsequent paths of both particles are 90 degrees.
But when a high-energy proton collides with a stationary proton, the angle between the two paths is not 90 degrees. Why is it so?

Homework Equations


½ mu2 = ½ mv2 + ½ ms2

The Attempt at a Solution


I answered that it's because the collision was not elastic so the above equation couldn't apply. But the answer is that because the proton is moving near speed of light so it's mass is greater than rest mass. So is this collision between the two protons still an elastic one? How to know whether a collision is an elastic or an inelastic one by its nature? I saw on some websites they say subatomic collisions are elastic but from another past paper it says the scattering between electrons and hydrogen nuclei is an inelastic collision...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mystreet123 said:

Homework Statement


A low-energy particle collides elastically with a stationary particle of the same mass. The angle between the subsequent paths of both particles are 90 degrees.
But when a high-energy proton collides with a stationary proton, the angle between the two paths is not 90 degrees. Why is it so?

Homework Equations


½ mu2 = ½ mv2 + ½ ms2

The Attempt at a Solution


I answered that it's because the collision was not elastic so the above equation couldn't apply. But the answer is that because the proton is moving near speed of light so it's mass is greater than rest mass. So is this collision between the two protons still an elastic one? How to know whether a collision is an elastic or an inelastic one by its nature? I saw on some websites they say subatomic collisions are elastic but from another past paper it says the scattering between electrons and hydrogen nuclei is an inelastic collision...
The collision is elastic if the colliding parties remain the same. If two protons collide, both of them remain the same protons. If an electron collides with a proton, you can get a neutron and a neutrino , for example; or you can get a hydrogen atom - these are inelastic collisions.
 
  • Like
Likes mystreet123
ehild said:
The collision is elastic if the colliding parties remain the same. If two protons collide, both of them remain the same protons. If an electron collides with a proton, you can get a neutron and a neutrino , for example; or you can get a hydrogen atom - these are inelastic collisions.
Thank you so much!
 
I never understood why the equation was ½ mu2 = ½ mv2 + ½ ms2 in the first place. I understand the mu and mv portion, but I don't quite understand the ms part of the equation. What is it derived from?
 
Disputationem said:
I never understood why the equation was ½ mu2 = ½ mv2 + ½ ms2 in the first place. I understand the mu and mv portion, but I don't quite understand the ms part of the equation. What is it derived from?
Note that you are responding to a five year old thread to ask a peripherally related question.

My response moved to https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...sions-between-particles.1006366/#post-6531530
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top