Elastic Collision of two wood blocks

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum height to which a block (m1 = 5.07 kg) rises after an elastic collision with another block (m2 = 11.0 kg) on a frictionless track. It emphasizes that energy is conserved in elastic collisions, but since the masses are different, m1 will rebound rather than return to its original height. To solve the problem, two equations must be set up: one for conservation of momentum and another for conservation of kinetic energy. The solution involves simultaneous equations leading to a quadratic equation, which provides two sets of answers, with one being the correct post-collision speeds. The conversation also touches on the relative velocity concept in elastic collisions, suggesting that using the center-of-mass reference frame simplifies the calculations.
Jacob87411
Messages
170
Reaction score
1
Two blocks are free to slide along a frictionless wooden track ABC as shown in Figure P9.20. The block of mass m1 = 5.07 kg is released from A. Protruding from its front end is the north pole of a strong magnet, repelling the north pole of an identical magnet embedded in the back end of the block of mass m2 = 11.0 kg, initially at rest. The two blocks never touch. Calculate the maximum height to which m1 rises after the elastic collision.


I put the figure attached. I just want to know if I am missing something here. Theres no friction, and its an elastic collision. Isn't energy conserved and the block will just rise back to 5m?
 

Attachments

  • p9-26.gif
    p9-26.gif
    3.4 KB · Views: 572
Physics news on Phys.org
That would happen only if the two blocks had the same mass. Since they don't the first block will not come to rest after the collision, but rebound backwards. The energy will now be split (not evenly) between the two masses.
What you got to do is set up two equations, one using the conservation of momentum, and one for conservation of kinetic energy (which only happens in perfectly elastic collisions). There are two unknown variables, the speeds of 1 and 2 after the collision.

Simultaneous equations will take you to a quadratic solution. That means there will be two sets of answers. One of these will be the speeds before the collision, the other set will be the correct answer.
 
The relative velocity after an elastic collision is the opposite (negative) of
the relative velocity before the collision. This, and momentum equation,
are not as tough to solve as momentum and KE.

In the center-of-mass reference frame, the initial velocities (inward)
both become opposite directions during an elastic collision. This is easy.
 
OK, so that way is easier, but...

OK it's a lot easier.
 
ok i have the same problem and can't arrive at a solution can someone help out


thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top