Elastic vs. Completely Elastic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nx01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elastic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on classifying a collision involving a 2.4kg ball that rebounds after hitting the floor. The ball hits the ground at 2.5 m/s and rebounds at 1.5 m/s, leading to the conclusion that the collision is inelastic. Participants debate the distinction between "elastic" and "completely elastic" collisions, with some arguing that such distinctions may be misleading. It is noted that while macroscopic collisions are typically not completely elastic, they can be approximated as elastic. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that the terms are relevant for understanding the nature of collisions.
nx01
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 2.4kg ball falling vertically hits the floor with a speed of 2.5m/s and rebounds with a speed of 1.5m/s. The impact or "collision" described in this problem is:

a. completely elastic
b. completely inelastic
c. elastic
d. inelastic

2. The attempt at a solution

As I understand it, the collision in this problem is "inelastic". However, the answer choices make a distinction between "completely elastic" and "elastic" collisions. Since there are no elastic collisions on the macroscopic scale, this cannot be a "completely elastic" collision. Yet, since some macroscopic collisions are approximated as elastic collisions, this might count as an "elastic" collision.

Is the distinction between elastic and completely elastic collisions a legitimate one, or is it there just to throw me off? How would you answer this question?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's there just to throw you off. A collision is either elastic or not. On the other hand, an inelastic collision isn't necessarily completely inelastic, so it makes sense to make a distinction.
 
Thank you!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top