Electric and Magnetic Field Relationship at the Surface of a Wire

bmb2009
Messages
89
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 0.60 m long circular tungsten wire with a radius of 0.05 m is connected to a DC power source resulting in a current of 0.65 A in the wire. Calculate the magnitude of the electric to magnetic field ratio at the surface of the wire. The resistivity of tungsten is 5.6 · 10-8 Ωm


Homework Equations



B(inside a wire) = μ*I/2∏R^2 * r where R = the radius of the wire and r = location within the wire radius... and since it is at the surface r=R.

Is that how you calculate the B field?

Also, I have no idea how to calculate the E field at the surface. I don't know how to relate resistivity into any of this. And does the I'm assuming the fact that it is a circle affects something but I don't know what.

I'm really lost on this problem so any response will be greatly appreciated!


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good on the B field except is r squared? For E, you can try applying Ohm's law to a short segment of the wire.
 
Well since the r=R R/R^2 should reduce down to just R correct? and do you mind expanding on that? I really don't know how to do that :/
 
Nevermind I got it! thanks though
 
Oh, you were correct on the R factor. Good.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top