Electric capacitance adding charged particals, rate

cheff3r
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Okay so the question is

15. (a) Calculate the electric capacitance of the Earth.
(b) Positively charged cosmic ray particles are known to arrive at Earth at the rate of
approximately 1 particle per square centimetre per second. If each particle is
assumed to be singly charged, calculate:-
(i) the electric current carried to the Earth by these particles;
(ii) the rate at which the electrostatic potential of the Earth would rise if there
were no other charge movements to or from the Earth.

my solution
a) knowing Earth's radius of 6380km
C=4*(pi)*ε*R
=4*3.141*8.85*10^-12*6380*10^3
=709.53 mF

b) my problem with b is up until now the queestions not involving flow of charge, so here's my guess its something to do with divergence (we slightly touched on the topic in class) on the other hand doesn't it take more energy everytime charge is added to a capacitor so wouldn't that mean it is dependent on time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(b.i) Current is measured in Amperes. 1 Ampere = 1 Coulomb/second. How many Coulombs/second total reach the Earth's surface?

(b.ii) You know from part (a) that the potential of the Earth is
V = \frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}R}
where Q s the total charge on the Earth at a given time. Can you find an expression for \frac{dV}{dt} ?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top