Electric charge in parallel plate capacitor with 2 parallel dielectrics

AI Thread Summary
In a parallel plate capacitor with two parallel dielectrics, the total electric charge is indeed the sum of the charges in each dielectric, expressed as qtotal = q1 + q2 = σ1*A/2 + σ2*A/2. The discussion raises questions about the neutrality of dielectrics and clarifies the configuration of the dielectrics—whether they are side by side or stacked. It emphasizes the need to identify commonalities between the two halves to derive relevant equations. Participants are encouraged to complete their attempts at solutions while adhering to forum guidelines. Understanding the arrangement and properties of the dielectrics is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
AndrejN96
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


My question is: If we have a parallel plate capacitor with 2 parallel dielectrics both taking A/2 of the complete surface, is the total electric charge equal to sum of the electrical charges in the first dielectric and the second dielectric, i.e is qtotal=q1+q21*A/2+σ2*A/2?

Homework Equations


Ctotal=C1+C2

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aren't dielectrics supposed to be neutral ?
Try to find something the two halves have in common.
Re problem statement: what are parallel dielectrics in this context? Are there two capacitors side by side or is there a stack of two dielectris between two capacitor plates ?

Re equations: Try to find something the two halves have in common and find equations that involve it
And please fill in the attempt at solution. We aren't allowed to assist otherwise. See PF guidelines
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top