Electric Current Homework: Solving Equations of Motion & Complex Conductivity

johnaphun
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The model for the resistivity of metals can be described differently by adding the scattering term into the electron equation of motion.

mx'' + (2m/t)x' = qE

Where x is a mean quantity.

DC conductivity is found by considering the steady state when E is constant. Show that this results in the above equation leading to an equation for mean velocity of qEt/2m and that this equation in turn results in a more familiar equation of conductivity.
Now consider the case where an oscillating electric field is applied, by writing E as E^eiωt . Solve the equation of motion in this case and show that this leads to a complex AC conductivity varying with frequency as

s(w) = s(0)/1+iωt/ 2

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm ok with the first two parts of the question but I'm really stuck on the oscillating field bit, any help would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a well-known differential equation. The solution is x=a*e^iwt, where a is a complex number (so phase is included). Plug it into the differential equation and you'll see why it's a good ansatz.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top