Electric field at the centre of a ball

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at the center of a ball with a volume charge density defined as rho = a.r. The original poster encounters discrepancies in their solutions using different methods, prompting a request for clarification on their approach. Participants suggest that the variation of the unit vector r hat complicates integration in spherical coordinates, advocating for a conversion to Cartesian coordinates for simplicity. Alternative methods, such as applying Maxwell's equations in differential form or using the Laplace equation to find voltage, are also proposed as potential solutions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the constancy of unit vectors in integration processes.
Nitin Gupta
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Question : Find the electric field at the centre of a ball of radius R with volume charge density rho = a.r, where a is a constant vector and r is a radius vector drawn from ball's centre.

Relevant Equations and attempt at solution : I used the basic formula for electric field due to continuous volume charge density and arrived at an equation which I tried to solve two different ways as shown in image. I am getting different solutions by trying different methods which is not possible.
I have tried to think of a reason for this and my reasoning for this anomaly has been shown in the image.
Please help me in figuring out where my approach went wrong.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20160628_234944_1467138002625.jpg
    IMG_20160628_234944_1467138002625.jpg
    33.3 KB · Views: 554
Physics news on Phys.org
When theta varies, ##\hat r## varies, no?
 
  • Like
Likes Nitin Gupta
haruspex said:
When theta varies, ##\hat r## varies, no?

Oho.. And since r hat is varying I can't take it as a constant under integration.. That's why we convert the spherical system to cartesian one.. Where the unit vectors are independent of the angles.. And that was the point of this exercise.. To teach us to consider the constancy of unit vectors when doing problems...

Is there any other way this could be done without resorting to cartesian coordinate system (or, for that matter, any system where the unit vectors are independent of angles)..such that I integrate using r hat itself..??
 
did you try the Maxwell equation in differential form?
div E=rho/e
you used intergral form.
Or use Laplace equation to find voltage then use E=-gradV
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Nitin Gupta
Hamal_Arietis said:
did you try the Maxwell equation in differential form?
div E=rho/e
you used intergral form.
Or use Laplace equation to find voltage then use E=-gradV
Yeah... Actually I wanted to figure it out this way
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top