Electric field at (x,y) from uniformly charged rod.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at a point (x, y) from a uniformly charged rod positioned along the x-axis. Participants express confusion regarding the variables used in the equations, particularly the constants k, λ, and a, and how they relate to the problem. There is a debate about the ambiguity in defining these variables and whether the program can accurately interpret them. Additionally, questions arise about the redefinition of coordinates in the context of the problem. The conversation highlights the challenges of integrating for both x and y components in this physics problem.
MusWolf
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A thin rod carries a charge Q distributed uniformly over its length L , and is situated on the x-axis between x=±L/2. Find the electric field at an arbitrary point (x, y). (You will have to do separate integrals for the x and y components.)

Homework Equations


∫dE=∫kdq/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


cm5lb9q.png

mk3g2IV.png

[/B]
Mastering Physics is telling me that the answer does not depend on k, lambda or a, which are variables I defined.

I have another method of attempting the question which results in a nasty integration, it's basically Mastering Physics being very ambiguous in what I am allowed to define. As seen here:

vTWYyvn.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello MW, :welcome:

A few questions to begin with: how would the program be able to understand how you defined ##a## and ##\lambda## ? Shouldn't you use ##y## and ##Q/L## instead ?

And I don't understand how you can redefine x in an x, y coordinate system ?

MusWolf said:
is telling me that the answer does not depend on k, lambda or a,
How does it do that ? Or is that a different program ?

Is your handwriting meant to be read by others than yourself ? I find it difficult ...
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top