Electric field due to charged rods

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric field at point P due to a charged vertical rod, the relevant equation is given as E = (λL) / (4πε₀√(x² + L²/4)). The discussion highlights the need to evaluate the integral for a uniform line of charge across the length of the rod. The user expresses uncertainty about how to proceed with the calculations after establishing the initial formula. A diagram is suggested to aid in visualizing the problem and setting up the integral. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately determining the electric field at point P.
-EquinoX-
Messages
561
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



If I have a charged vertical rod and a point P which is distanced x from the perpendicular bisector of it. How do I find the electric field at P if x/(/l/2) < 1, where l is the length of the rod

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the equation of an electric field due to a charged rod at P is:

\frac{\lambda L}{(4 \pi \epsilon_0) * sqrt(x^2 + L^2/4)}

I don't know how to proceed further
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd draw a diagram and write a formula for a uniform line of charge and evaluate the integral over the range of the coordinates for the length of the rod.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top