Electric field & energy in a spherical distribution of charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a homework problem related to electric fields and energy in a spherical charge distribution. Participants express confusion regarding the application of Gauss's law, particularly in determining the electric field inside and outside the sphere. There is a debate about the correct bounds of integration and assumptions regarding charge density, specifically the need to clarify conditions for regions inside and outside the sphere. Some contributors suggest using electric displacement as an alternative approach, while others advocate for sticking with Gauss's law. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clearer problem statements and collaborative problem-solving.
Cocoleia
Messages
293
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


upload_2017-2-16_22-20-39.png


Homework Equations


Gauss

The Attempt at a Solution


I am really confused with question a, I have an idea of how to answer b and c once I obtain an answer for part a... My best guess would be to use Gauss, but I am not sure. Would the field inside be 0? What will the bounds of integration be when I integrate to find the charge, right now I get a charge of 2pi(a^3)? I am working on my solution and will post a picture when I get something useful, but can someone explain? Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Choose a suitable volume to write out your relevant equation in terms of the variables and post your working...
 
The question is a bit unclear. I assume that a/r is for the charge density at a distance r from the centre of the sphere radius a.
 
I agree (as almost always :smile:). It is unclear in the sense that (most probably) the composer forgot to mention 'for ##r\le a##' in ##'\rho = ...' \ ##; and ## \rho = 0\ ## for ##r>a## ' so you make that assumption, mention it in your answer, and continue with the exercise.
 

Homework Statement


upload_2017-2-24_12-24-22.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I am at the first part of the question. For the inside field, I did the following (and the same for the outside, just using different bounds of integration)
upload_2017-2-24_12-31-0.png

In the given solution, they use electric displacement
upload_2017-2-24_12-28-0.png

Why not just use Gauss' law like usual, like I did?
 
They do. ##\vec D=\varepsilon \vec E##.

I will ask a mentor to move this to the identical thread you started a week ago ...
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top