Electric field for point charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric field produced by a charged plate that allows a piece of aluminum foil to hover. The initial calculation mistakenly used grams instead of converting to kilograms, leading to an incorrect gravitational force of 45.6 N. The correct weight should be calculated using the mass in kilograms, resulting in a gravitational force of approximately 0.0456 N. This correction leads to the accurate calculation of the electric field as 4557 N/C. The importance of unit conversion in physics problems is emphasized throughout the discussion.
tuggler
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




You charge a piece of aluminum foil (mass = 4.65 g) by touching it to a charged rod. The charged rod gives the aluminum foil a charge of 10 µC. Your professor brings a charged plate over and tells you to put the aluminum foil on top of the plate. To your surprise the aluminum foil hovers motionless in the air above it! Calculate the value of the electric field from the charged plate (assume it is a uniform field and the aluminum foil is a point charge).

Homework Equations



F = Eq and F = ma



The Attempt at a Solution



What I did was first calculate the gravitational force with the equation F = ma = (9.8m/s^2)(4.65g) = 45.6 N. Then I use the equation F = Eq \implies E= F/q, where E = electric field, q = charge, and F = force.

Thus F = 45.6, q = 10e-6 \implies 45.6N/(10e-6 µC ) = 455700 N/C.

But it is wrong. What did I do wrong? Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tuggler said:
What I did was first calculate the gravitational force with the equation F = ma = (9.8m/s^2)(4.65g) = 45.6 N.

Do grams times meters per seconds squared give Newtons?
 
No, it does not, but kilograms over s^2 does.
 
So what's the correct weight then?
 
It is 4557 N/C. THANKS!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top