Electric field from uniform charge of finite length

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field generated by a uniform charge of finite length placed along the x-axis. In part (a), the contributor attempts to derive the expression for the electric field contribution from a differential charge segment, using variables such as charge Q, length L, and distance y. There is uncertainty regarding the integration process needed to find the total electric field in part (b), which should be expressed in terms of Q, L, and y. The contributor seeks clarification on the reasoning behind their derived equation and the integration limits. The overall goal is to understand the electric field behavior, particularly as the length of the charge approaches infinity.
Pyuruku
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform charge Q of length L is placed on the x-axis with one end at the origin as shown

ZFMF9.png


a) Find the contribution dE (vector) to the electric field at P on the y-axis a distance y from the origin, from the charge at x in dx, in terms of Q, L, dx, ke, x and y

b) Find the total E (vector, in component form) from the whole line of charge at y on the y-axis in terms of Q, L, ke, y; also find E (vector) for |y| >> L

c) Use the result in (b) to obtain the behavior of E (vector, in component form) on the y-axis if L is infinite in the +x direction (left end remains at 0)



Homework Equations


elin.gif
I believe this is all I need?


The Attempt at a Solution



a)
\huge dE = \frac{k\lambda dx}{r^2}<\frac{x}{r},\frac{y}{r}> = \frac{kQdx}{(x^2 + y^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}L}<x, y>

This doesn't look right to me, and I'm a bit stuck on trying to integrate this... I'd assume you integrate with respect to X from 0 to L...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well let's check it then: what was the reasoning you used to get to that equation?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top