Electric Field in an Infinitely Long Cylinder of Uniform Charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving expressions for the electric field around an infinitely long cylinder with uniform positive charge density. For points outside the cylinder (r > R), the electric field is given by E = (ρR²)/(2ε₀r₁). For points inside the cylinder (r < R), the electric field is expressed as E = (Qr₂)/(2πε₀R²). The original poster seeks confirmation of their calculations and any corrections if necessary. Participants in the thread express appreciation for the review and confirm the calculations appear correct.
Dominguez Scaramanga
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, I'm very sorry for my first two posts being rather long problems, but could any of you possibly give me a hand with the following...? :rolleyes:

the question is as follows;
"Consider an infinately long cyliner of radius R, and uniform positive charge per unit volume \rho. Derive expressions for the electric field (i) outside the cylinder r&gt;R, and (ii) inside the cylinder r&lt;R"

let me show you what I have...
I'll be calling r outside the cylinder r_{1} and inside r_{2}. also the length of the cylinder will be called l.

(i) for r&gt;R

\phi_{E}=\oint E\cdot dA = E2\pi r_{1}l
\phi_{E}=\frac{Q}{\varepsilon_{0}}
E=\frac{Q}{2\pi\varepsilon_{0} r_{1}l}

now Q=\rho\pi R^2 l

so E=\frac{\rho R^2}{2\varepsilon_{0} r_{1}}


(ii) for r&lt;R

\phi_{E}=\oint E\cdot dA = E2\pi r_{2}l
Q&#039; = \varepsilon_{0}\pi r_{2}^2 l = Q \frac{r_{2}^2}{R^2}

\Longrightarrow \frac{Q&#039;}{\varepsilon_{0}} = \frac{Qr_{2}^2}{\varepsilon_{0}R}

and finally, we have...

E=\frac{Qr_{2}}{2\pi\varepsilon_{0}R^2}


phew... sorry everything gets a bit tiny towards the end, I'm not sure how to change that :blush:

would someone be so kind as to confirm that this is correct for me? or, (in the likely event that), if it's wrong, offer some advice as to where I've gone wrong?

thank you all very much in advance :smile:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
for what it is worth

Dominguez Scaramanga said:
Hi everyone, I'm very sorry for my first two posts being rather long problems, but could any of you possibly give me a hand with the following...? :rolleyes:

the question is as follows;
"Consider an infinately long cyliner of radius R, and uniform positive charge per unit volume \rho. Derive expressions for the electric field (i) outside the cylinder r&gt;R, and (ii) inside the cylinder r&lt;R"

let me show you what I have...
I'll be calling r outside the cylinder r_{1} and inside r_{2}. also the length of the cylinder will be called l.

(i) for r&gt;R

\phi_{E}=\oint E\cdot dA = E2\pi r_{1}l
\phi_{E}=\frac{Q}{\varepsilon_{0}}
E=\frac{Q}{2\pi\varepsilon_{0} r_{1}l}

now Q=\rho\pi R^2 l

so E=\frac{\rho R^2}{2\varepsilon_{0} r_{1}}


(ii) for r&lt;R

\phi_{E}=\oint E\cdot dA = E2\pi r_{2}l
Q&#039; = \varepsilon_{0}\pi r_{2}^2 l = Q \frac{r_{2}^2}{R^2}

\Longrightarrow \frac{Q&#039;}{\varepsilon_{0}} = \frac{Qr_{2}^2}{\varepsilon_{0}R}

and finally, we have...

E=\frac{Qr_{2}}{2\pi\varepsilon_{0}R^2}


phew... sorry everything gets a bit tiny towards the end, I'm not sure how to change that :blush:

would someone be so kind as to confirm that this is correct for me? or, (in the likely event that), if it's wrong, offer some advice as to where I've gone wrong?

thank you all very much in advance :smile:

I gave it a quick once-over in my head, and it looks correct... but math in my head is not my strong point!
 
hey, thank you very much for giving it the once over though! it's very much appreciated :smile:
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top