Electric Field/ infinite charged sheet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the electric field produced by three charged sheets with different charge densities. The electric field due to an infinite sheet is given by the formula E = σ/2ε, where σ is the charge density. The user is confused about why the electric field vectors from sheet 2, which has a negative charge density, are twice the magnitude of those from sheets 1 and 3, which have positive charge densities. Clarification is provided that the center sheet's surface charge density is -2σ0, explaining the discrepancy in magnitudes. The conversation emphasizes the consistent application of Gauss' Law and the properties of electric fields from charged sheets.
Andy13
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There are three charged sheets with various charge densities. The following link shows a diagram, and solutions (not mine; these are some professor's solutions but I don't understand them yet):

http://www.phy.syr.edu/courses/PHY212.08spring/HW/WHW-3.pdf

Draw vectors at each of the points A-D to show the direction and relative magnitude at the point due to a) sheet 1 b) sheet 2 c) sheet 3.

Homework Equations



E field due to infinite sheet = σ/2ε
(where ε = permittivity constant and σ = charge density)

Flux = ∫ EdA = E*A = |E||A|cos(θ)

Gauss' Law: Flux = q(enclosed)/εo

The Attempt at a Solution



I know which direction the vectors go, but I don't know what their magnitudes are. Surfing the internet gave me this (scroll to last page):

http://www.phy.syr.edu/courses/PHY212.08spring/HW/WHW-3.pdf

I know that the magnitudes of each vector of the electric field from each individual sheet from points A-D should be equal, because the electric field from a charged sheet doesn't depend on radius (for example, sheet 1's field could give vectors of magnitude |a| at every point).

However, I don't understand why sheet 2 (σ = -1), according to the above solutions, has vectors of twice the magnitude of sheets 1 and 3 (σ= +1). What am I missing?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with you.

His solution is consistent with the center sheet having a surface charge density of -2σ0 .

(I have taught this subject for more than 20 years.)
 
SammyS said:
I agree with you.

His solution is consistent with the center sheet having a surface charge density of -2σ0 .

(I have taught this subject for more than 20 years.)

Thanks SammyS-- I'm glad I wasn't misunderstanding something.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top