Electric Field: not quite getting the correct answer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric flux for two uniform electric fields, E1 and E2, given their magnitudes and angles relative to the surface normal. The user attempts to compute the total flux using the formula flux = E * A * cos(θ) for both fields but finds their answer incorrect. It is clarified that both fields are at an angle of 60 degrees from the surface normal, which affects the cosine factor in the calculations. The user seeks assistance in identifying the error in their approach. Accurate calculations of electric flux are essential for determining the enclosed charge using Gauss's law.
Seraph404
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



YF-22-35.jpg


E1 = 2.9E4 N/C
E2 = 8.6E4 N/C
Both fields are uniform

Homework Equations



flux = \int Eperp*dA = Qencl/ \epsilon0


The Attempt at a Solution





flux1 = E1cos(30)(.05m)(.06m)
flux2=E2cos(30)(.05m)(.06m)
(flux1+flux2) = Qencl/ \epsilon0

Homework Statement



But my answer is wrong. I appreciate any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the question?

Also, those fields are at an angle of 60 degrees from the surface normal.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Applying Gauss' Law: Solving Electric Field Problems
Replies
1
Views
2K
How to find the potential difference with constant charge
Replies
1
Views
1K
What is the magnitude & direction of the eletric field?
Replies
10
Views
4K
Electric Field of a Point Charge
Replies
3
Views
1K
Magnitude of a Net Charge within a closed surface
Replies
7
Views
9K
Direction and magnitude of electric field produced by current change
Replies
8
Views
981
Electric field at the center of the equilateral triangle
Replies
10
Views
3K
Gauss' Law for a Nonuniform Field
Replies
1
Views
1K
Electric field at a point inside a non-uniformly charged sphere
Replies
6
Views
1K
Finding magnitude of electrical field at specific point
Replies
1
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top