Electric Field of a Charged Spherical Shell: Inside and Outside Analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the electric field of a charged spherical shell with a positive charge density on the upper half and a negative charge density on the lower half. Using Gauss's law, it is concluded that the electric field inside the sphere is zero due to the conditions of electrostatic equilibrium. For the outside, while the net electric flux is zero, the electric field near the surface is determined to be E = σ/ε₀, decreasing to near zero as distance increases. The problem's specification of upper and lower halves complicates the application of Gauss's law compared to simpler scenarios. Overall, the analysis emphasizes the unique characteristics of the electric field distribution due to the asymmetric charge distribution.
tronter
Messages
183
Reaction score
1
A thin spherical shell of radius R has charge density + \sigma on the upper half and - \sigma on the bottom half. Determine the electric field both inside and outside the sphere.

So its an area charge density. So I tried using Gauss's law: \oint \bold{E} \cdot d \bold{a} = \frac{Q_\text_{int}}{\epsilon_{0}}.

E(\pi r^2) = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_{0}}.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tronter said:
So I tried using Gauss's law
OK. What did you get for the field?
 
I'm not completely sure of this answer but...since its a surface charge density, the sphere seems to match the conditions of a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium. So the net electric field inside the sphere should simply be 0N/C. Outside the sphere, you'll get that the net electric flux is 0...but that doesn't mean that the electric field outside the sphere is 0. Near the surface of the sphere, the electric field should be E(\pi r^2) = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_{0}} (what you basically did) and the further away you are, it should come close enough to 0N/C since the net charge on the sphere is 0C.
 
Note that the problem specifies upper half and lower half, not inner surface and outer surface. (The latter would indeed be an easy problem to solve using Gauss's law; the former, not so easy.)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top