Electric field strength at a point due to 3 charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field strength at a point due to three charges, resulting in a proposed value of 13q for the new charge needed to balance the electric field to zero. The user applied the electric field equation and equated the contributions from the existing charges, seeking verification of their calculations. Other participants suggest providing more detailed steps in the solution to clarify the reasoning, particularly regarding the absence of 'x' in the equation and the sign choices for the terms. Overall, the consensus leans towards the correctness of the user's answer, pending further elaboration on the methodology. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clear problem-solving steps in physics calculations.
Tesla In Person
Messages
34
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
Find the value of the charge placed at the point that makes the electric field 0.
Relevant Equations
Electric field: Kq /r^2
I got E. 13q as the answer. That is what i did: The electric field due to +q at origin 0 should equal the electric fields of charges -3q and the new charge placed at 2x. So applying the equation above like this; k*(q) / (2^2) = -3q*k + (k*C)/ 4 solving for C the new charge added, gives 13q. I don't know if it's correct because i don't have the answer to this question . Can you please check my working thanks.
 

Attachments

  • 3.PNG
    3.PNG
    30.2 KB · Views: 157
Physics news on Phys.org
Tesla In Person said:
Homework Statement:: Find the value of the charge placed at the point that makes the electric field 0.
Relevant Equations:: Electric field: Kq /r^2

I got E. 13q as the answer. That is what i did: The electric field due to +q at origin 0 should equal the electric fields of charges -3q and the new charge placed at 2x. So applying the equation above like this; k*(q) / (2^2) = -3q*k + (k*C)/ 4 solving for C the new charge added, gives 13q. I don't know if it's correct because i don't have the answer to this question . Can you please check my working thanks.
I think your answer is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes Tesla In Person
In order to make it easier for someone to follow your solution, you could show more steps. In particular, show why x does not appear in your equation and explain the choice of signs for the terms in your equation.
 
TSny said:
I think your answer is correct.
It must be if it really is "Tesla".
 
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes Tesla In Person and TSny
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top