Electric field strength at the midpoint between the two charges.

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric field strength at the midpoint between a +7.3 nC and a -2.4 nC charge that are 3.5 cm apart, the distance from each charge to the midpoint is 1.75 cm (0.0175 m). The electric field due to each charge is calculated using E = k*q/r^2, resulting in E1 = 214,531 N/C for the positive charge and E2 = -70,530.6 N/C for the negative charge. Since both electric fields point in the same direction towards the negative charge, they should be added together, leading to a total electric field strength of 144,000 N/C. However, this value does not match the provided multiple-choice options, indicating a potential error in the calculations or assumptions about direction. Clarification on the direction of the electric fields and the correct application of the equations is necessary for accurate results.
momopeaches
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A + 7.3 nC point charge and a - 2.4 nC point charge are 3.5 cm apart. What is the electric field strength at the midpoint between the two charges?


Homework Equations


E = 9*10^9(q/r^2)
q = charge
r = distance from point charge


The Attempt at a Solution



Since the question asks for the field strength between the two charges, r would be 1.75 cm or .0175 m.
Therefore

E = E1+E2
E1=9*10^9(7.3*10^-9/.0175^2)
E1=214531
E2=9*10^9(-2.4*10^-9/.0175^2)
E2=-70530.6
E=144000 N/C

Except it says I'm wrong. Its multiple choice, and the other choices given are
1900 N/C
5700 N/C
2.8×10^5 N/C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you keep a positive test charge at the mid point, positive charge will repel it and negative charge will attract it. So E1 and E2 are in the same direction. Hence

E = E1+E2 = 214531 + 70530.6 = ...?
 
So, to make this work, would my E2 equation have to be E=9*10^9(q/-r^2)? I don't know what you mean when you say E1 and E2 are in the same direction.
 
momopeaches said:
So, to make this work, would my E2 equation have to be E=9*10^9(q/-r^2)? I don't know what you mean when you say E1 and E2 are in the same direction.

The magnitude of E2 = k*q2/r2 and the direction is towards -2.4 nC.

The magnitude of E1 = k*q1/r2 and the direction is towards -2.4 nC.

where r = d/2.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top