Electric field strength at the midpoint between the two charges.

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric field strength at the midpoint between a +7.3 nC and a -2.4 nC charge that are 3.5 cm apart, the distance from each charge to the midpoint is 1.75 cm (0.0175 m). The electric field due to each charge is calculated using E = k*q/r^2, resulting in E1 = 214,531 N/C for the positive charge and E2 = -70,530.6 N/C for the negative charge. Since both electric fields point in the same direction towards the negative charge, they should be added together, leading to a total electric field strength of 144,000 N/C. However, this value does not match the provided multiple-choice options, indicating a potential error in the calculations or assumptions about direction. Clarification on the direction of the electric fields and the correct application of the equations is necessary for accurate results.
momopeaches
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A + 7.3 nC point charge and a - 2.4 nC point charge are 3.5 cm apart. What is the electric field strength at the midpoint between the two charges?


Homework Equations


E = 9*10^9(q/r^2)
q = charge
r = distance from point charge


The Attempt at a Solution



Since the question asks for the field strength between the two charges, r would be 1.75 cm or .0175 m.
Therefore

E = E1+E2
E1=9*10^9(7.3*10^-9/.0175^2)
E1=214531
E2=9*10^9(-2.4*10^-9/.0175^2)
E2=-70530.6
E=144000 N/C

Except it says I'm wrong. Its multiple choice, and the other choices given are
1900 N/C
5700 N/C
2.8×10^5 N/C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you keep a positive test charge at the mid point, positive charge will repel it and negative charge will attract it. So E1 and E2 are in the same direction. Hence

E = E1+E2 = 214531 + 70530.6 = ...?
 
So, to make this work, would my E2 equation have to be E=9*10^9(q/-r^2)? I don't know what you mean when you say E1 and E2 are in the same direction.
 
momopeaches said:
So, to make this work, would my E2 equation have to be E=9*10^9(q/-r^2)? I don't know what you mean when you say E1 and E2 are in the same direction.

The magnitude of E2 = k*q2/r2 and the direction is towards -2.4 nC.

The magnitude of E1 = k*q1/r2 and the direction is towards -2.4 nC.

where r = d/2.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top