Electric field strenth question

AI Thread Summary
To determine the electric field strength required for 10.0 keV electrons to pass undeflected through a crossed-field velocity selector with a magnetic field of 1.0 x 10^-2 T, relevant equations for magnetic and electric forces must be applied. The energy of the electrons, given as 10.0 keV, can be converted to kinetic energy, which is essential for calculating their velocity. The initial assumption that the electric field strength equals the magnetic field strength is incorrect. The correct approach involves using the relationship between electric and magnetic forces, factoring in the velocity derived from the kinetic energy. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
dev-hud
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
A Crossed-field velocity selector has a magnetic field of magnitude 1.0 x 10^-2T. What electirc field strenght is required if 10.0 keV electrtons are to pass through undeflected?


ef - 1.0 x 10^-2

I know it gives magnetic field, except how and what formula do we use to figure out the electric field strenght when we are also given 10.0 keV?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dev-hud said:
A Crossed-field velocity selector has a magnetic field of magnitude 1.0 x 10^-2T. What electirc field strenght is required if 10.0 keV electrtons are to pass through undeflected?

ef - 1.0 x 10^-2

You should write down the relevant equations for the magnetic forces and the electric forces. You'll find that your answer of "ef - 1.0 x 10^-2" isn't quite right. Some of the relevant equations are a function of velocity.

I know it gives magnetic field, except how and what formula do we use to figure out the electric field strenght when we are also given 10.0 keV?

"10.0 keV" is a measure of energy; kinetic energy in this case, to be specific. Do you know of any unknown variables in your magnetic or electric field/force equations that you might be able to determine if you happened to know the kinetic energy of the electrons?
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top