Electric Field value at distances from charge or plate.

AI Thread Summary
To determine the Electric Field (E) value at distances from a single charge, the formula E = Kq/r^2 is applicable, where K is Coulomb's Constant. For a charged plate, the surface area does influence the electric field, especially when considering it as a capacitor with positive and negative plates. The electric field between two plates can be calculated, and the electrostatic force on a charge placed between them can be found using F = k(q1)(q2)/r^2, where q1 is the plate charge and q2 is the individual charge. Understanding these equations is crucial for solving problems related to electric fields and forces in electrostatics. The discussion emphasizes the importance of these formulas in analyzing electric fields from both point charges and charged plates.
Blaze3742
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If given a single charge (q), how would one determine the Electric Field (E) value at given distances?

How about from a plate? Would the given surface area play apart here?

Homework Equations


F=K(q1)(q2)/r^2, K= Coulomb's Constant = 9e^9 Nm^2/C^2, F=Eq, PE=qV, V=Ed


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org

Homework Statement


If given a single charge (q), how would one determine the Electric Field (E) value at given distances?

How about from a plate? Would the given surface area play apart here?

Homework Equations


F=K(q1)(q2)/r^2, K= Coulomb's Constant = 9e^9 Nm^2/C^2, F=Eq, PE=qV, V=Ed


The Attempt at a Solution


Possibly E=Kq/r^2 for the single charge? Still working on the capacitor.
 
Yes, E=kq/r^2 for a single charge. Where does it say that the plate is a capacitor?
 
Two plates are esentially a capacitor. Top plate Posotive and the Bottom plate Negative. Is there an equation to determine the Electric Field value (E,volts) at points between the plates? And what if a specific charge were placed at those points. Is there an equation to determine Electrostatic Force? Or would we just use F=k(q1)(q2)/r^2 with q1 being the plate charge and q2 being the individual charge?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top