Electric Field with three negative point charges in a line

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at point P due to three negative point charges arranged in a line. The user correctly identifies that the net electric field is the vector sum of the fields from each charge. They calculated the electric fields for the -5μC charges as -4,500,000 N/C each and for the -2μC charge as -5,000,000 N/C. However, they were reminded that the electric field is a vector quantity, necessitating consideration of direction in their calculations. The user ultimately seeks clarification on their approach and whether they made any errors in their calculations.
kddc
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the magnitude of the electric field this comination of charges produces at point P, which lies 6.00cm from the -2.00μC charge measured perpendicular to the line connecting the three charges.


Homework Equations


E=k\frac{Q}{r^{2}}
F=k\frac{q_{1}q_{2}}{r^{2}}
F=\frac{E}{q}
k\approx9*10^{9}

The Attempt at a Solution


Conversions to the correct units were done prior to plugging values into eqn.

To my understanding the net electric field is the sum of all electric fields from each point charge.
So I found E_{-5μC}=-4,500,000 and the same goes for the other -5μC point charge; E_{-5μC}=-4,500,000 , and for the -2μC point charge I got E_{-2.00μC}= -5,000,000

For E_{-5μC} I calculated and then plugged in \sqrt{(8cm^{2}+6cm^{2}}≈0.1m


Results summed up to E_{-5μC}+E_{-5μC}+E_{-2.00μC}=(-4.5*10^{6})+(-4.5*10^{6})+(-5.0*10^{6})= -1.40*10^{7}

The question only asked for magnitude so I'm assuming direction doesn't really matter at this point. What am I doing wrong? Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kddc said:

Homework Statement


Find the magnitude of the electric field this comination of charges produces at point P, which lies 6.00cm from the -2.00μC charge measured perpendicular to the line connecting the three charges.


Homework Equations


E=k\frac{Q}{r^{2}}
F=k\frac{q_{1}q_{2}}{r^{2}}
F=\frac{E}{q}
k\approx9*10^{9}

The Attempt at a Solution


Conversions to the correct units were done prior to plugging values into eqn.

To my understanding the net electric field is the sum of all electric fields from each point charge.
So far so good.

So I found E_{-5μC}=-4,500,000 and the same goes for the other -5μC point charge; E_{-5μC}=-4,500,000 , and for the -2μC point charge I got E_{-2.00μC}= -5,000,000
The electric field is a vector, and you must take the vector sum of the fields of the three charges.
 
Thank you!


Forgot to log in after having solved it.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top