Electric Fields: Charge/Unit Length on Inner Surface of Coaxial Cable

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the charge per unit length on the inner surface of a coaxial cable, participants explore the application of Gauss's law. The theory suggests that when a hollow cylindrical metal tube surrounds a wire with infinite charge, the inner surface of the tube will not have zero charge. Instead, due to the conductive properties of the metal, charges will redistribute themselves, creating a charge density on the inner surface. The radial distance of 2.5mm is relevant for calculating the electric field using the formula E = λ/(2πε_0 r). Overall, the scenario emphasizes the importance of understanding charge distribution in conductive materials within electric fields.
steph124355
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm a little stuck on the theory behind this question:

(in relation to a line of infinite charge: a wire)
A hollow cylindrical metal tube with inner radius 2.5mm is now placed around the wire, to form a coaxil cable. What will be the charge per unit length on the inner surface of the tube. Explain.

I am thinking it is 0, how or why i got that I don't know!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Make use of Gauss's law.
 
Use Gauss' law as though the cylinder is not there?
In which case to calculate using E= λ/(2πε_0 r) and use the 2.5mm as the radial distance?

Is there any different concepts behind this scenario compared to using a gaussian surface?
 
steph124355 said:
(in relation to a line of infinite charge: a wire)

Infinite charge...wow...wonder how that happens
 
Its not 0. Considering that metals are good conductors, what happens is that when placed in an electric field, a polar accumulation of charges occur (meaning the positive charges go in one direction and the negative in the other). Therefore, charges accumulate on the surfaces of the cylinder. The inner surface will have a charge density.
 
haha thanks!
physics does my head in but i enjoy it!
thanks for your help
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top