Electric Fields Lines of a pair of Finite Parallel Plates

AI Thread Summary
The electric field lines between a pair of finite parallel plates are uniform and directed from the positively charged plate to the negatively charged plate, with the field's magnitude being double that of a single plate. Near the edges of the plates, the electric field becomes non-uniform due to the concentration of charges at sharp edges, leading to a higher charge density. This phenomenon, known as "corona discharge," indicates that charge density is inversely proportional to the radius of curvature, resulting in greater charge density at the edges compared to the flat surfaces. The discussion highlights that while the charge distribution is uniform between the plates, it is not uniform at the edges, where charges tend to cluster more closely. Understanding these concepts is crucial for visualizing electric fields and charge distributions in finite parallel plate configurations.
TypeFun
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Comment on the electric field lines of a pair of finite parallel plates (a) between the plates and (b) near the edges of the plates.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
between the plates (basically near centers of plates) in is uniform, directed from + plate to - plate (obvious)
magnitude is double the mag due to any 1 plate

near the edge it will be non uniform
 
"magnitude is double the mag due to any 1 plate"
I don't understand this. Why is that so?

Also, is it correct to say that
(a) between the plates the distribution of charges will be uniform due to its flat nature, but (b) on the edges of the plates the distribution of charges will not be uniform because alone sharp edges charges tend to come together more closely than they typically do on a smooth surface
 
The magnitude is double because the electric field follows superposition and you have a plate that is positively charged (electric field outward) and a plate that is negatively charged (electric field inward).

I know that the fringing field is non-linear but I've never understood the flux density thing since there can be an infinite amount but the lines can't cross. I just can't visualize it so I stick with the results of the equations...
 
TypeFun said:
Also, is it correct to say that
(a) between the plates the distribution of charges will be uniform due to its flat nature, but (b) on the edges of the plates the distribution of charges will not be uniform because alone sharp edges charges tend to come together more closely than they typically do on a smooth surface

in a way you are right
This phenomena is called "corona discharge"
according to it ... charge 'density' is inversely proportional to the radius of surface.
the charge density will be more on th edges but on any flat surface will be same.

can you tell where "charge" will be maximum ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top