How Does Gauss' Law Apply to Infinite Charge Slabs?

AI Thread Summary
Gauss' Law can be applied to an infinite slab of uniform charge density by selecting an appropriate Gaussian surface, such as a cylinder or pillbox. The left-hand side of Gauss' Law represents the total electric flux, while the right-hand side calculates the enclosed charge using the charge density. The resulting electric field density, D, is derived as D = (d*ρ)/2. It's important to clarify that r² refers to the squared distance from the charged slab to the point of interest, not a physical radius. This method effectively demonstrates how to calculate the electric field density for the given infinite charge slab configuration.
shanty
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An infinite slab of uniform charge density ρ occupies the region -∞<x< ∞, -∞<y<∞, -d/2<z<d/2.


Homework Equations


Use Gauss' Law to calculate the electric field density for -∞<z<∞


The Attempt at a Solution



D=εE.
Using that, I just need to find D = \frac{1}{4*Pi}∫\frac{ρ}{r^2}dv.

But I don't know what to use as a radius...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation you wrote is not Gauss' Law. Also, r2 is not a "radius." It is the squared distance between the location of the charged slab and the point at which you wish to sample the electric flux density.

Gauss' Law is:

\oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{a} = \frac{Q_{Enclosed}}{ε_0}

Start by choosing a closed Gaussian surface: a cylinder, a pillbox, etc. Then write down what you would get on the LHS of the equation, which is the total electric flux. Then, on the RHS, write the total charge enclosed QEnclosed in terms of the charge density. What do you get?
 
Last edited:
D = (d*ρ)/2.

∫∫D(dot)ds = ∫∫∫ρdv

Where bounds are -x < x < x and -y < y < y. z bounds for the volume are -d/2 < z < d/2.

I see. Thanks.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top