What Is the Value of Point Charge q in a Square Configuration?

AI Thread Summary
In a square configuration PQRS with point charges -Q, +Q, and -3Q fixed at points P, Q, and S, respectively, a point charge q at R experiences a net electric force towards S. The calculations indicate that the forces acting on q can be simplified, leading to the conclusion that q can be determined as 1/9 Q. The vertical components of the forces from points P and Q cancel each other, while the horizontal components add up towards S. There is some uncertainty expressed regarding the question's clarity and potential mistakes. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the importance of using trigonometry to resolve the forces acting on charge q.
Clara Chung
Messages
300
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


PQRS is a square. Three point charges -Q, +Q and -3Q are fixed at P, Q and S respectively as shown.

A point charge q is then placed at R and it experiences a net electric force towards S. Which of the following is equal to q?

photo :
http://s613.photobucket.com/user/Yan_Wa_Chung/media/01_zps421rebzc.png.html

Homework Equations


F=kq1q2/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


in any kind of calculation, Q and q are canceled out and undetermined ,ie : (k1) (q) (Q) / (r1)^2 = (k2) (q) (Q) / (r2)^2, (turn force PR to vertical and horizontal component cancel the vertical component with force QR) . I have no idea on the question or maybe the question itself has mistakes ?The right answer is q=1/9 Q.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think any value of q (+ve) will do since the distances are fixed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
cnh1995 said:
Vertical component of force PR cancels force QR. Horizontal component of force PR and force SR add up along SR and hence, the resultantant is directed towards S. All you need to do is use trigonometry to calculate the respective components, with only one unknown q. How is q undetermined?
But suppose vertical component of force PR is ##-cos(\pi/4)kQq/r_1^2## so since it is canceled by force QR we 'll have
##-cos(\pi/4)kQq/r_1^2+kQq/r_2^2=0##. Isnt the product Qq simplified by this last equation?
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
Delta² said:
But suppose vertical component of force PR is ##-cos(\pi/4)kQq/r_1^2## so since it is canceled by force QR we 'll have
##-cos(\pi/4)kQq/r_1^2+kQq/r_2^2=0##. Isnt the product Qq simplified by this last equation?
Yes. I was about to edit..
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Thanks a lot for answering this question. I think the question may have mistakes itself. I hope I can get some help with the last stupid question that I've posted too. Thanks.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top