Electric Potential and velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a charged ball's motion through a voltage difference. The key equation for conservation of energy is highlighted, showing the relationship between kinetic energy and electric potential energy. A sign error in the initial setup is identified, which leads to confusion in solving for the final velocity. Participants clarify that the initial voltage does not need to be known, as it cancels out in the calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the conservation of energy principle in electric potential scenarios.
Ryan060
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small ball has a mass of mass m 4.0 x 10^-8 kg and a charge of q = -2.0 x 10^-5 C. It enters a box with an initial speed of v0 = 1.0 x 10^4 m/s. The point where the charge leaves the box is at a voltage 350 kV higher than the entry point.

Homework Equations


1/2mv^2(f)-1/2mv^2=qV(f)-qV(i)

The Attempt at a Solution


1/2(4.0 x 10^-8)v^2-1/2(4.0 x 10^-8)(1.0 x 10^4)=q(V(f)-V(i))
1/2(4.0 x 10^-8)v^2-1/2(4.0 x 10^-8)(1.0 x 10^4)^2=-2.0x10^-5(3.5x10^5)
1/2(4.0 x 10^-8)v^2-(2)=-7 <-- there is were it all falls apart as you can see i will end up with a (-) under the sqrt and that is just a fail. I understood everything in physics right up until EP and now the emails i get from my professor are just useless. thanks for your help in advance. i am assuming that the 350kv is the V(f)-V(i) is this wrong?
[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a sign error in your original equation. The electric potential energy U is equal to qV, so conservation of energy gives you
$$\frac{1}{2} mv_i^2 + qV_i = \frac 12 mv_f^2 + q V_f.$$
 
vela said:
You have a sign error in your original equation. The electric potential energy U is equal to qV, so conservation of energy gives you
$$\frac{1}{2} mv_i^2 + qV_i = \frac 12 mv_f^2 + q V_f.$$
I rearranged the equation s subtracting qVi and KE(f) in that form i end up with 2 unknowns rewritten out :

2.0+-2.0x10^-5(Vi)=1/2(4.0 x 10^-8)v^2+-2.0x10^-5(Vi+3.5x10^5)

if i had Vi this would be easy should i be solving for that somehow ...i really don't get this. The lecture was a pretty much pointless activity and the book is 2 pages on this section so i feel pretty in the dark at the moment
 
You don't need ##V_i##. It cancels out.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top