Electric Potential @ center of an equilateral triangle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential at point P, the center of an equilateral triangle with side length 2a and total charge Q, using infinity as the reference point. The initial attempt involved integrating the electric potential from a charge distribution, but the user struggled with the limits and the symmetry of the triangle. Participants clarified that the integration should account for all three sides of the triangle and suggested integrating from the axis of symmetry. The final answer derived is k(Q/a) ln(2 + sqrt(3)), confirming the importance of proper limits and symmetry in the calculation. The conversation highlights the collaborative effort to resolve the integration challenges in determining electric potential.
Nyquilt
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



14w7qts.jpg


What is the electric potential at point P, the center of an equilateral triangle with side length of 2a and total charge of Q? Use infinity as the reference point.


Homework Equations



∆v = -∫E∙ds
v(r)= kq/r

The Attempt at a Solution



I already have the answer which is k(Q/a) ln(2+sqrt(3)) but I don't know how to get it. This is what I tried:

v = kq/r = ∫kdq/r = ∫k lamda dx/r = k lamda ∫dx/sqrt(x^2 + (a/sqrt(3))^2) = k lamda ln(x + sqrt(x^2 + (a/sqrt(3))^2)).

I evaluate that integral from 0 to 2a

k lamda ln(2a - sqrt(4a^2 + (a^2)/3) - k lamda ln(a/sqrt(3))
= k lamda ln(2sqrt(3) - sqrt(13)) = kQ/(2a) ln(2sqrt(3) - sqrt(13))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your substitution for r = sqrt(x^2 + (a/sqrt(3))^2 Fixes the origin for your x-axis somewhere. Where is that point? How does that change the limits for your integral?
 
Hmm I guess the origin for the x-axis is at the axis of symmetry. If that's the case then I integrate from -a to a?
 
Yes. Either that, or you can further exploit symetry by only integrating from 0 to a and multiplying by 2. Also, your integral was the potential from only one side of the triangle. I'm not sure if you multiplied by 3.
 
That worked great. Thanks a lot for the help. I was stuck on this for a while.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top