Electric potential due to a solid sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential inside and outside a uniformly charged solid sphere using Griffiths' textbook. The user successfully applies Gauss's law and an integral formula for potential but encounters confusion regarding the volume element and the integration variables. They realize that the volume element should include an additional r² term and that they need to differentiate between the point where the potential is calculated and the charge element's position. Clarifications about the integration process and variable notation help the user refocus on solving the problem correctly. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precise mathematical notation and understanding the physical context in electrostatics.
Marcus Nielsen
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Member advised to use the homework template for posts in the homework sections of PF.
Hello Guys! This is my first post so bear with me. I am currently studying the basics of electrostatics using the textbook "Introduction to electrodynamics 3 edt. - David J. Griffiths". My problem comes when i try to solve problem 2.21.

Find the potential V inside and outside a uniformly charged solid sphere whose radius is R and whose total charge is q. Use infinity as your reference point. Compute the gradient of V in each region, and check that it yields the correct field. Sketch V(r).

Using the equation V(r) = \int\limits_O^r \boldsymbol{E} \cdot \mathrm{d} \boldsymbol{l} and Gauss law \oint \boldsymbol{E} \cdot \mathrm{d} \boldsymbol{a} = \frac{Q_{enc}}{\epsilon_0}, I can solve the problem and get the same answer as in this guide http://www.physicspages.com/2011/10/08/electric-potential-examples/ first example. But my problem appears when I want to use the formula V(\boldsymbol{r})= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int \frac{\rho(\boldsymbol{r'})}{\eta} \mathrm{d}\tau' where \boldsymbol{\eta} = \boldsymbol{r}-\boldsymbol{r}' as defined in Griffiths textbook.

This is my calculation using the last formula.

We got a solid sphere with radius R and total charge q, therefore \rho = \frac{q}{\frac{4}{3} \pi R^3}

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> V &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int \frac{\rho(\boldsymbol{r&#039;})}{\eta} \mathrm{d}\tau&#039; \\<br /> &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int\limits^{2 \pi}_0 \int\limits^{\pi}_{0} \int\limits^{R}_0 \frac{\rho}{\sqrt{r^2+z^2-2rz \cos(\theta)}} \sin(\theta) \ \mathrm{d}r \ \mathrm{d}\theta \ \mathrm{d}\phi<br /> \end{align*}<br />
Using substitution <br /> g =r^2+z^2-2rz \cos(\theta) \longrightarrow \mathrm{d}\theta = \frac{1}{2rz \sin(\theta)} \mathrm{d}g<br />
<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> V &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int\limits^{2 \pi}_0 \int\limits^{g(\pi)}_{g(0)} \int\limits^{R}_0 \frac{\rho}{2rz\sqrt{g}} \ \mathrm{d}r \ \mathrm{d}g \ \mathrm{d}\phi\\<br /> &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} 2 \pi \int\limits^R_0 \int\limits^{g(\pi)}_{g(0)} \frac{\rho}{2rz \sqrt{g}} \ \mathrm{d}g \ \mathrm{d}r\\<br /> &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \epsilon_0} \int\limits^R_0 \int\limits^{g(\pi)}_{g(0)} \frac{\rho}{rz \sqrt{g}} \ \mathrm{d}g \ \mathrm{d}r\\<br /> &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \epsilon_0} \int\limits^R_0 \frac{2\rho}{rz} \Big[ \sqrt{g} \Big]^{g(\pi)}_{g(0)} \ \mathrm{d}r\\<br /> &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \epsilon_0} \int\limits^R_0 \frac{2\rho}{rz} \Big( \sqrt{r^2+z^2+2rz} - \sqrt{r^2+z^2-2rz} \Big) \ \mathrm{d}r\\<br /> &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \epsilon_0} \int\limits^R_0 \frac{2\rho}{rz} \Big( \sqrt{(r+z)^2} - \sqrt{(r-z)^2} \Big) \ \mathrm{d}r\\<br /> \end{align*}<br />
At this stage I am a bit confused, the r will cancel out and i will be left with 1/r which will turn out to ln(r) after integration, does anyone know what am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Marcus Nielsen said:
Hello Guys! This is my first post so bear with me. I am currently studying the basics of electrostatics using the textbook "Introduction to electrodynamics 3 edt. - David J. Griffiths". My problem comes when i try to solve problem 2.21.

Find the potential V inside and outside a uniformly charged solid sphere whose radius is R and whose total charge is q. Use infinity as your reference point. Compute the gradient of V in each region, and check that it yields the correct field. Sketch V(r).

Using the equation V(r) = \int\limits_O^r \boldsymbol{E} \cdot \mathrm{d} \boldsymbol{l} and Gauss law \oint \boldsymbol{E} \cdot \mathrm{d} \boldsymbol{a} = \frac{Q_{enc}}{\epsilon_0}, I can solve the problem and get the same answer as in this guide http://www.physicspages.com/2011/10/08/electric-potential-examples/ first example. But my problem appears when I want to use the formula V(\boldsymbol{r})= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int \frac{\rho(\boldsymbol{r&#039;})}{\eta} \mathrm{d}\tau&#039; where \boldsymbol{\eta} = \boldsymbol{r}-\boldsymbol{r}&#039; as defined in Griffiths textbook.

This is my calculation using the last formula.

We got a solid sphere with radius R and total charge q, therefore \rho = \frac{q}{\frac{4}{3} \pi R^3}

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> V &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int \frac{\rho(\boldsymbol{r&#039;})}{\eta} \mathrm{d}\tau&#039; \\<br /> &amp;= \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int\limits^{2 \pi}_0 \int\limits^{\pi}_{0} \int\limits^{R}_0 \frac{\rho}{\sqrt{r^2+z^2-2rz \cos(\theta)}} \sin(\theta) \ \mathrm{d}r \ \mathrm{d}\theta \ \mathrm{d}\phi<br /> \end{align*}<br />
Is the volume element really sin(θ) dθ dΦ dr?
What is z?
 
Last edited:
Oh there is actually missing a r^2. Due to Griffiths book the volume element is given by the formula \mathrm{d} \tau = r^2 \sin(\theta) \ \mathrm{d}\theta \ \mathrm{d}\phi \ \mathrm{d}r.
 
Marcus Nielsen said:
Oh there is actually missing a r^2. Due to Griffiths book the volume element is given by the formula \mathrm{d} \tau = r^2 \sin(\theta) \ \mathrm{d}\theta \ \mathrm{d}\phi \ \mathrm{d}r.
Yes, but you integrate with respect to r'. You have to use different symbols for the position of the point r where you want to determine the potential, and the position of the charge element r' inside the sphere. And what is z?
 
19679579_10213964056523381_1499090821_n.jpg

So z is the distance from the origin to the point where I want to know the potential. The shown figure above is made for a shell, so the small rectangle should be a small volume element. And the angle \theta&#039; is what I call \theta
 
Aarh I see. I am actually confusing my self by avoiding the ' symbol. Thanks I will try again.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top