Electric potential for an infinite plane charge distribution

p3rry
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,
I have to calculate the electric field and the potential for a charge q placed at distance d from an infinite plane charge distribution \sigma.

For the electric field there's no problem, but how I can get the electric potential for an infinite charge distribution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Integrate the field.
 
ok, but I get an unknown constant.

The field is E=\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_{0}} in the x direction. So if I integrate it I get

V(x)=V(0)-\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_{0}}x

Where the constant is unknown...maybe I don't need to know it

Further, if I calculate the potential starting from a circular plane distribution and then pulling the radius to infinity I get an infinite potential
 
Last edited:
p3rry said:
ok, but I get an unknown constant.

The field is E=\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_{0}} in the x direction.


No, that's just the field of a uniformly charged plate with surface charge density \sigma... what about the field of the point charge?

So if I integrate it I get

V(x)=V(0)-\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_{0}}x

Where the constant is unknown...maybe I don't need to know it

There is always an "unknown constant" when calculating the potential. This is because it is determined from the differential equation \textbf{E}=-\mathbf{\nabla}V, and as you should know, first order DE's need at least one boundary/initial condition to find a unique solution...You are free to choose any value for your constant, simply by choosing a suitable reference point (a point where you define the potential to be zero)...in this case, choosing the origin as a reference point makes things simple (so that V(0)=0).


Further, if I calculate the potential starting from a circular plane distribution and then pulling the radius to infinity I get an infinite potential

Unless you show your calculation, I cannot be certain of your error, but I suspect you are unknowingly choosing your reference point to be at r=infinity...r=infinity is usually a bad choice of reference point when dealing with charge distributions the extend to infinity.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top