Electric Potential in Insulated U-Tube

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric potential at the center of curvature of an insulated U-tube with a uniformly distributed charge Q, the principle of superposition is essential. The potential can be determined by separately calculating the contributions from the semicircular arc and the two straight arms of the U-tube. The potential from the arc can be computed using the formula V = (1/4πε₀)(Q/r), where r is the radius of the arc. For the arms, the distance from the center of curvature to the ends of the arms should be used in the same formula. Summing the potentials from both components yields the total potential at the center of curvature.
PK_Kermit
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey, I have this question, and I'm having quite a bit of difficulty figuring it out.

"An insulating rod is bent into a semicircular arc of radius a, and a total electric charge Q is distributed uniformly along the rod. Calculate the potential at the center of curvature of the arc if the potential is assumed to be zero at infinity."

Which i see to be as so:

...|...|..........
...|...|...........
...|...o...|...<- the 'o' represents the center of curvature of
...\... /.........the arc...
....\.../...<-- this part is round.....
...u............

There is a similar question in my textbook, where tehy work out the potential at a point from a ring of charge. they use the equasion:

V= (1/4[pi]E0) [integral] dq/r

[where dq would be infinitismal elements of charge about the ring]

for the ring, the r distance is always the same; so they remove r and integrate dq, to end with:

V= (1/4[pi]E0) ( Q / r )

now, my question is the U tube. I figure, since under the center of curvature lies a semicircle, maybe you could take half the potential found from the previous equasion; i.e., for the curvature part, you could use:

0.5(1/4[pi]E0)( Q / r )

but, there is nothing in my textbook to say what I would do in terms of the extending arms of the U tube; as well, the question doesn't say anything about the length of the arms.

what is the significance of defining V to be zero at infinity, and where should I go from here?

Thanks,
PK_Kermit
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The significance of defining the potential to be zero at infinity is that it allows you to calculate the potential at any given point using the principle of superposition. This means that you can break down the problem into parts, and sum up the resulting potentials at each part to get the total potential at the center of curvature. For this particular problem, you can calculate the potential at the center of curvature by breaking the problem into two parts: the potential due to the arc of the U-tube and the potential due to the two arms of the U-tube. The potential due to the arc can be calculated using the equation you provided (V = (1/4πε₀) (Q/r), with r being the radius of the arc and Q being the total charge). For the arms, you can use the same equation, but with the distance from the center of curvature to the end of the arm as the value for r. Once you've calculated the potential due to each part, you can add them together to get the total potential at the center of curvature.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top