Electromagnetism - Dielectric and Various Cavities

MITlurker
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A large block of dielectric contains small cavities of various shapes whose sizes are much smaller than the block. The dielectric has uniform polarization P except those cavities which are assumed not to disturb the polarization of dielectric.
(a) Show that, inside a needle-like cavity parallel to P, the electric field E(inside the cavity) is the same as in the dielectric.
(b) Show that, inside a thin crack perpendicular to P, the electric field E(inside the cavity) is εr times larger than in the dielectric.
(c) Show that, at the center of a small spherical cavity, E=P/3*μ0.

Attempt at Solution:

a) q = σbA = P*A
Working this out E = \frac{PA}{∏εl^2} - \frac{-PA}{∏εl^2}

l is the length of the slit

E = \frac{2PA}{∏εl^2} Z

However as A is very small in that direction, E needle is close to zero. So E0 is the E-field in the cavity.

b) This is where I'm stuck.
I assumed that the slit acted like a plate capacitor and attempted to go from there with σ+ on the top and σ- on the bottom. However, I get the E field of the perpendicular cavity is E0 + P/ε, which is not a multiple of εr

Homework Equations



E = - ∇V

E = \frac{V}{d}, where d should be considered extremely small in part (b)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For a) and b) I would use continuity rules of E and D fields parallel and perpendicular to an air-dielectric interface. What are they? You might want to be in a position to defend them if called upon ...

Hints:
a) what would discontinuity of the E field imply that we know is incorrect?
b) what would discontinuity of D imply that we know is incorrect? Realize there is no free charge at the air-dielectric interface. (D = epsilon*E for both air and dielectric).
c) got to think about that one.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top