Electromagnetism direction rule

AI Thread Summary
To determine the direction of current in electromagnetism, one must understand the relationship between the original magnetic field and its rate of change. The induced electromotive force (εmf) opposes the change in the magnetic field, as stated in Lenz's Law. When calculating current direction, it is crucial to differentiate between the strength of the magnetic field and the strength of its rate of change, as they can point in different directions. The induced current will create its own magnetic field that opposes the original change. This understanding is key to solving problems involving current direction without a force present.
Jabababa
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



#45
What is the magnitude and the direction of the current?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to get the magnitude but i don't get the current direction...how do i find out which way the current goes?

What is the general rule to find the direction of current or magnetic field without a force? I know how to do it with all 3 but sometimes they only give me the current and the magnetic field direction but not force.
 

Attachments

  • 111111.png
    111111.png
    12.7 KB · Views: 489
Physics news on Phys.org
The direction of the induced εmf is such that it opposes the direction of the change in the original magnetic field. This is where the negative sign comes from in Lenz's Law.

While that's the official answer, I empathize that it might still be confusing. (εmf is endless source of confusion for almost everybody.)

So let me phrase it another way. This way is less elegant, but hopefully more insightful. But first we must make a distinction of our terms.

When you calculated the magnitude, you already made the distinction between the original magnetic field and the rate of change of the original magnetic field. They are two different things, and can be -- and often are -- in completely different directions (and can be -- and often are -- in the same direction). My point here is that making the distinction between strength of the field and strength of the rate of change of the field is an important distinction to make.

Moving on...

You know that a changing field will induce an εmf in the wire loop. That εmf will cause a current to flow through the wire if the circuit is closed (like it is here). That current will induce a magnetic field of its own (through the same loop). And (...here's the important part...) the direction of that induced magnetic field is in the opposite direction of the rate of change of the original magnetic field. I think that's the general rule you're looking for.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top