Electromotive Force Homework: Vertical Conducting Rods & Uniform Magnetic Field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics homework problem involving two vertical conducting rods connected to a capacitor and a horizontal conducting rod in a uniform magnetic field. Key calculations include determining the electromotive force (emf) using the formula ε = vBd and addressing the acceleration of the horizontal rod, which involves gravitational and magnetic forces. Participants suggest using the relationship between induced current and the change in velocity to simplify calculations. The energy balance of the system is also analyzed, equating gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy and capacitor energy. Overall, the conversation focuses on clarifying the steps to solve for acceleration, induced current, and energy balance in the context of electromagnetism.
intervoxel
Messages
192
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Two vertical conducting rods separated by a distance d are connected to a capacitor of capacitance C. Another horizontal conducting rod of mass m is released at position y=y0 at time t=0 always in contact with the two vertical ones. The set is immersed in a uniform magnetic field B perpendicular to both rods.

a) Calculate the acceleration; the velocity and the distance delta y at time t.
b) What is the induced current?
c) Analyse the balance of energy of the system.

Homework Equations


- standard electromagnetism formulas

The Attempt at a Solution


a)
- calculate the emf:

<br /> \varepsilon=\oint f_s \cdot dl <br />
<br /> F_s=q(v\times B)<br />
<br /> f_s=v\times B<br />
<br /> \varepsilon=vBd <br />

<br /> \varepsilon=V <br />
Is the signal correct?

- calculate the acceleration:

<br /> a=g - F_M/m=g-[q(v\times B)]/m <br />

Here I'm stuck: How can I get rid of q?

<br /> v=\int_0^t a dt <br />

<br /> y=y_0+vt+(1/2)at^2 <br />

b)

<br /> I=dq/dt=CdV/dt=C\frac{d}{dt}(vBd)=CBd\frac{dv}{dt}=CBda<br />

c)

- formulate energy balance:

<br /> mgy=(1/2)mv^2+(1/2)CV^2 <br />
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
intervoxel said:

The Attempt at a Solution


a)
- calculate the emf:

<br /> \varepsilon=\oint f_s \cdot dl <br />
<br /> F_s=q(v\times B)<br />
<br /> f_s=v\times B<br />
<br /> \varepsilon=vBd <br />

<br /> \varepsilon=V <br />
Is the signal correct?
Signal?

If you're asking about \varepsilon = vBd, sure, that looks right. I would have used \varepsilon = -\frac{\mathrm{d}\Phi_B}{\mathrm{d}t} to get it, but the answer is the same either way.

intervoxel said:
- calculate the acceleration:

<br /> a=g - F_M/m=g-[q(v\times B)]/m <br />

Here I'm stuck: How can I get rid of q?
Try \vec{F}_M = I\vec{L}\times\vec{B} instead... at least, that's all I can think of. If that's what they're after, it seems a little strange that the problem asks you to calculate acceleration before induced current, unless they want you to leave a in terms of I.
 
Oh, I see. More generally
<br /> \overrightarrow{F}=I\oint_C \overrightarrow{dl}\times \overrightarrow{B}<br />
Thank you.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top