Electron accelerated though constant E field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the momentum and kinetic energy of an electron in a constant electric field of 1000 V/m, both in the lab frame and in a rocket moving at 0.99c. Participants suggest starting by plotting the electron's position over time and applying Lorentz transformations to convert coordinates to the rocket's frame. The next steps involve determining the velocity in the rocket's frame and subsequently calculating the kinetic energy. This approach emphasizes the importance of understanding relativistic effects on the electron's motion. Overall, the thread seeks guidance on tackling the physics problem effectively.
deadscientist
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Suppose an electron is initially at rest in a constant E field of 1000 V/m as measured in the lab. Determine the electrons momentum and kinetic energy as a function of time a) in the lab frame b) in the frame of.a rocket moving at .99c in the direction of the electric field. Not quite sure how to approach the problem any suggestions would be greatly appreciated thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
deadscientist said:
Suppose an electron is initially at rest in a constant E field of 1000 V/m as measured in the lab. Determine the electrons momentum and kinetic energy as a function of time a) in the lab frame b) in the frame of.a rocket moving at .99c in the direction of the electric field.


Not quite sure how to approach the problem any suggestions would be greatly appreciated thank you.
Why not start by plotting position as a function of time? What would that graph look like?

The next step would be to apply the Lorentz transformation to the x and t coordinates to get the x' and t' coordinates in rocket's frame of reference.

Then work out v' in the rocket's frame of reference using those x' and t' coordinates. Then work out v^2 to find kinetic energy.

AM
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top