Medical Electron Acceleration and X-Ray Emission in X-Ray Machines

AI Thread Summary
Accelerated electrons emit electromagnetic radiation, including x-rays, but the processes of Bremstrahlung and K-shell emission are crucial for generating significant x-ray intensity in machines. While pure acceleration can produce x-rays, practical applications require specific wavelengths and intensities, achieved through targeted materials like molybdenum or copper. The effectiveness of x-ray generation is significantly enhanced by the short distances over which electrons decelerate upon striking a target, leading to much higher power emissions. The relationship between acceleration and emitted power is governed by the Larmor formula, highlighting that the power radiated is proportional to the square of acceleration. Thus, while basic electron acceleration can produce radiation, advanced mechanisms are essential for efficient x-ray production in medical and industrial applications.
AndresPB
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
Good morning all, I was just wondering the following question. When an electron is accelerated it emits electromagnetic radiation, depending on how much it is accelerated the energy varies so the frecuency does and the electromagnetic wave emitted would be of different colors or maybe even x-rays if the velocity is high enough. If this happens inside an x-ray machine, then why is it neccesary for the process of Bremstrahlung to occur? or K-shell emision? Would the electron alone be enough to generate x-rays or it is enough and the other fenomena occur only to generate more of them?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
AndresPB said:
When an electron is accelerated it emits electromagnetic radiation, depending on how much it is accelerated the energy varies so the frecuency does and the electromagnetic wave emitted would be of different colors or maybe even x-rays if the velocity is high enough. If this happens inside an x-ray machine, then why is it neccesary for the process of Bremstrahlung to occur? or K-shell emision? Would the electron alone be enough to generate x-rays or it is enough and the other fenomena occur only to generate more of them?

It is a fact that accelerated charged particles radiate EM radiations of variety of wavelengths and even shortest wavelength x-rays can generated by pure acceleration or deceleration but a technology developes by its utility in various sector-

for example if one wishes to see fracture in a boiler frame he will need an intense beam of particular wavelength ,so a Mo target is used to get intense beam of about 0.7 angstrom.

similarly for various purposes a handy focussed x-ray tubes have been developed.

for general continuous x-rays one can use the 'simple x-ray device' but its not falling in particular range of wavelengths needed as well as 'intensity' is also an issue.
..
in most of the structure analysis /diffraction experiment cu-tube with copper as target are being utilised.
If one looks up the Intensity distribution of X-rays coming from a tube -the sharp peaks of 'characterist emissions' have large intensity difference from the continuous x-rays sector -thats why the target -tubes are popular than simple cathode ray tubes .

moreover for larger acceleration of a charge particle one needs a synchrotron type of arrangement where the particle can be pushed to large accelerated velocity -and synchrotron beams are also used in research and other scattering processes.
however the Roentzen Ray Tubes are still in the top rung.
 
Ok so i think we can conclude is that the acceleration via potential difference is not enough for a good amount of x rays to produce so the bremshtrahlung or characteristic emision processes are the ones that matter for this fenomena, my last question would be why does the order of magnitute affect this processes? Why a potential difference applied in a magnitud order of cm's achieve to emit a foton of less frecuency than a desacceleration process that occurs in the magnitute order of an atom? (Bremstrahlung)? Can someone put a formula?
 
Last edited:
I think the result that you're after essentially comes down to the fact that the power emitted by a point charge under acceleration or deceleration is proportional to the square of its acceleration. Look up the Larmor formula if you want the details.

So you're right that the distances over which the electron moves make the difference. The potential difference in an x-ray tube will accelerate electrons across a gap of ~10 cm or more. But then they strike a target material, the electrons decelerate over a very small distance. A 100 keV electron has a range of about 15 microns in Tungsten. So you're looking at a ratio of distances on the order of 10^4 under which an electron gains or loses it's energy. So I would guess the radiated power difference would be on the order of 10^8! And that's probably an underestimate given that the electron's path in the metal is not really a constant slowing, but rather brief instances of hard breaking interspersed within longer straighter path segments.
 
  • Like
Likes AndresPB
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top