Electron and hole concentration

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating electron and hole concentrations in a non-degenerate semiconductor at 300 K, given an intrinsic carrier concentration of 2 x 10^13 cm^-3 and effective densities of states of 10^19 cm^-3. For part one, it is confirmed that in an intrinsic semiconductor, the electron concentration (n) equals the hole concentration (p), both equaling the intrinsic carrier concentration. In part two, the calculation for the Fermi level position relative to the conduction band is discussed, with the assumption that n equals n_i being correct for intrinsic materials. The responses clarify that the calculations are valid under the intrinsic semiconductor assumption. The thread emphasizes the importance of confirming the intrinsic nature of the sample for accurate results.
NerdyGuy
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Physics, Semiconductor, carrier concentration
1. part unsolved
2. part solved, but not sure
Relevant Equations
##n = N_C \exp \left( - \frac{E_C - E_F}{k_B T} \right)##
##n_i (T) = \sqrt{N_C N_V} \exp \left( - \frac{E_g}{2 k_B T} \right)##
I can't solve the following exercise:

Assume for a certain non-degenerate semiconductor sampe at T = 300 K an intrinsic carrier concentration ##n_i = 2 \cdot 10^{13} \frac{1}{cm^3}## and the band effective densities of states ##N_C = N_V = 10^{19} \frac{1}{cm^3}##.
1. Determine the electron and hole concentrations n and p.
2. Find the position of the Fermi level in respect to the conduction band.

For part 1 I tried:
$$n_i (T) = \sqrt{N_C N_V} \exp \left( - \frac{E_g}{2 k_B T} \right) \\
= ... \approx 0.68 eV$$
But here I'm not sure if this is necessary and how to continue. Can anybody please help me?

My calculation for 2 is:
$$n = N_C \exp \left( - \frac{E_C - E_F}{k_B T} \right) $$
$$\Leftrightarrow E_C - E_F = k_B T \ln \left( \frac{N_C}{n} \right) $$
$$\Leftrightarrow E_C - E_F = 1,38 \cdot 10^{-23} \frac{J}{K} 300 K \ln \left( \frac{10^{19} \frac{1}{cm^3}}{2 \cdot 10^{13} \frac{1}{cm^3}} \right) $$
$$\approx 0.34 eV$$

Can anyone confirm this? Is the last step correct, where I set ##n = n_i = 2 \cdot 10^{13} \frac{1}{cm^3}##?

Best regards

NerdyGuy
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
First, welcome to PF!

For part #1, you did not state what values ##n## and ##p## are. Is this an intrinsic sample? If it is you can answer part #1 trivially. For part #2, you are correct only if this is an intrinsic semiconductor.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...