Electron Bombardment: Safety Check for X-Rays?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yipyap777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron
AI Thread Summary
Firing electrons at 15 kV can produce X-rays when they interact with materials like glass or wood, primarily due to their binding energies. Although the resulting X-ray energies are typically low (less than 1 or 2 keV), protective measures are still recommended. Reducing the voltage to 10 kV may decrease the quantity of X-rays produced, but they will still be present, albeit in lower amounts. The choice of material, whether wood or glass, can affect the electron's deceleration rate, but the specific application will determine the best option. The discussion also touches on using electrons to create light through argon gas, similar to a Crookes tube setup.
yipyap777
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi
Lets say i had a vacuum and was fireing electrons at 15kv at a piece of wood or glass. Is there any danger of xrays from the electron bombardment or does this only occur when they hit hard metals?

Cheers
Nick
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the binding energies of the K,L-shells of the constituent elements (atoms). Those will be the characteristics X-rays from glass or wood. There will be some brehmsstrahlung radiation.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/tables/kxray.html

http://xdb.lbl.gov/Section1/Table_1-2.pdf
http://xdb.lbl.gov/Section1/Table_1-3.pdf
http://xdb.lbl.gov/Section1/Sec_1-8.pdf

It seems that X-rays would have energyies mostly less the 1 or 2 keV.

This is low X-ray or high UV. So do use protection.
 
Last edited:
Thanks so much for you input.
Lets say i can get the voltage down to 10kv, it should fall in the realm of safe working without having to protect myself from xrays?
 
also is there any material that we could use to cause a slower decent rate of the electrons, eg wood, glass ?? which is better?
 
yipyap777 said:
Thanks so much for you input.
Lets say i can get the voltage down to 10kv, it should fall in the realm of safe working without having to protect myself from xrays?
The X-rays are characteristic of the transition levels of each element. Even at 10 kV, one would still get the same X-rays energies which are less than 10 kV, but there would be fewer of them.

also is there any material that we could use to cause a slower decent rate of the electrons, eg wood, glass ?? which is better?
What is it that one is trying to do?

Electrons are used for many different tasks, from diffraction, to electron microscopy, to welding, to . . . .
 
i would like to create a beam of light through argon gas using electrons. Similar to the crooks tube, but without the phosphorus coating on the side of the tube.

I have seen them built without the coating.. just using gas instead.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top