Electron Energy Levels in Nanowire | Approximation & Quantum #s

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around approximating an electron in a nanowire as a one-dimensional infinite square-well potential, specifically for a 2 um long wire at 13K. The calculated energy for the first quantum level (n=1) is confirmed as 9.40 x 10^-8 eV. However, confusion arises regarding the second energy level, where the participant believes it should be four times the first level's energy (n=2 leading to E2 = 4E1). The book claims it is only twice the first energy level, leading to a disagreement on the correct calculation. This discrepancy highlights the need for clarity on energy level equations in quantum mechanics.
Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
The question is:

We can approximate an electron moving in a nanowire as a one-dimensional infinite square-well potential. Let the wire be 2 um long. The nanowire is cooled to a temperature of 13K, and we assume the electron’s average kinetic energy is that of a gas molecule at this temperature ( = 3/2 kT). (a) What are the three lowest possible energy levels of the electrons? (b) What is the approximate quantum number of the electrons moving in the wire?

So I have the equation to find the energy in an infinite well…

\[<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> E_n = n^2 \frac{{\pi ^2 (\hbar c)^2 }}{{2mc^2 L^2 }} \\ <br /> L = 2*10^3 nm \\ <br /> m = 5.11*10^5 eV \\ <br /> \hbar c = 197.33eV*nm \\ <br /> \end{array}<br /> \]

Using this, I find n=1 to equal 9.40*10^-8 eV

The book says I am good there.

The problem is when I have to find the second energy level. I figured you use n=2 which means its just 2^2 or 4 times the energy but the book says its just 2 times the energy of the first energy level. What am I not understanding here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm pretty sure the book made a mistake. For n=2, E2 = 4*E1 = 3.8 X 10^-7. I double checked with cramster, and that's how it was done there also.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top