Electron in a magnetic field and angular momentum

AI Thread Summary
An electron moving in a magnetic field of 1 mT has an angular momentum of 4.00E-25 kg m^2/s. The relevant equations include F=qvB and r=mv/qB, which relate force, velocity, magnetic field, and radius. The discussion focuses on deriving velocity and radius from angular momentum, with the conclusion that using the equation √(qB(vr)/m) simplifies the process. The participant successfully calculated the values for radius and velocity, confirming their results aligned with the expected outcomes. This method is considered efficient for solving similar problems in physics.
Munky
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An electron moves in a circular path perpendicular to a constant magnetic field with a magnitude of 1 mT. The angular momentum of the electron about the center of the circle is 4.00E-25 kg m^2/s.

m= 9.109E-31 kg
q= 1.602E-19 C
B= 0.001 T

I also know that the answer is

r = 5.00 cm
v = 8.78E6 m/s


Homework Equations



F=qvB
or
qvB=mv^2/r
or
r=mv/qB


The Attempt at a Solution



My problem is that I know I need to get either F, v, or r from the angular momentum, but I cannot find any way to do that. If I were able to solve for one of those variables, the other two are simple to figure. I have another similar question where I need to know how to do this... and for the life of me I can't figure it out.

Thanks for any help you can be.

Munky
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Munky ! Welcome to PF!
Munky said:
qvB=mv^2/r

ok … you know q B m and rv …

and your equation has q B m v and r …

just fiddle around with it! :smile:
 
Thanks for the response, cryptic as it seemed at first, it helped.

I don't know if I was clear, but I was supposed to solve for v and r, and wasn't sure how momentum fit in.

Your response was enough to make me look a little further, knowing that I had what I needed. I found that angular momentum "l" is the cross product of radius and mass times velocity. The cross product, in this case, is a non-issue because the sin theta = 1.

I did the resulting math and got the same (within rounding error) result as I got multiplying the answers (r times v).

Finally, the square root of qB(vr)/m gave me my velocity... from which getting radius is no problem.

Is that the easiest way to do this? It's been about 8 years since I took physics 1, and some of the stuff I should "know," I simply don't.

Thanks for your reply and the welcome.

Munky
 
Munky said:
Thanks for the response, cryptic as it seemed at first, it helped.

We try not to give away too much, so that you can get the answer yourself! :biggrin:
Finally, the square root of qB(vr)/m gave me my velocity... from which getting radius is no problem.

Is that the easiest way to do this?

Yup … √qB(vr)/m was what I meant … definitely the easiest way. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top